PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 9452249

Sequential outer table craniotomy a in hyperossified meningioma. Technical note.

Abstract

A hyperossified meningioma with significant calvarial thickening is fairly common. Craniectomy of the involved region followed by cranioplasty is usually required to resect the bone overgrowth. However, in some cases, the hyperossified calvaria is too thick to allow safe penetration with a craniotome or trephine. In this report, the authors present a technique for preserving the outer calvaria while still resecting the majority of the underlying tumor mass. The key is to perform a craniotomy in a region adjacent to the hyperossified bone and to remove the tumorous, ossified inner table through this "window" by means of a high-speed drill. A second craniotomy can then be performed over the undermined area; this maneuver can be advanced and repeated until the tumor is resected. Frameless stereotactic guidance and microplates are useful in performing this procedure.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G P Colón, D A Ross, J T Hoff. 1998. Sequential outer table craniotomy a in hyperossified meningioma. Technical note.. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1998.88.2.0346

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Cosmetic osteoplastic craniotomy with a chisel and hammer.

BACKGROUND: Osteoplastic craniotomy has been performed recently with microfixation systems such as miniplates, burr hole buttons, and/or ceramic dust. However, these are costly methods of treatment. Without the use of these devices, we performed cosmetic osteoplastic craniotomy using an inexpensive chisel and hammer. METHODS: Our osteoplastic craniotomy with a chisel and hammer was used on 19 lesions in 15 patients. Using a chisel, the bone flap was cut gently from the calvarium to the skull base, the lamina externa to the diploe (finally the lamina interna), and both ends to the midportion between two holes. The lamina interna in the cranium was trimmed easily after removal of the bone flap. The bone defect was minimal because of the absence of a narrow cutting groove and because craniectomy was not performed. The bone flap was replaced by tapping and was tightly fixed. No special fixation system was needed, except for threads. RESULTS: Follow-up (mean follow-up, 5 months; range, 5 weeks to 9 months) skull X-ray and 3D-CT showed good fusion and inherent normal configuration of the bone flap. There were two minor dural tears and two minor bony fractures. CONCLUSION: A good cosmetic effect without the use of any additional instruments was accomplished with osteoplastic craniotomy using a chisel and hammer.

Craniotomy

Orbitozygomatic approach by transposition of temporalis muscle and one-piece osteotomy.

BACKGROUND: A more simplified and easier technique for the orbitozygomatic approach is sought. We have developed a new modification to fully expose the temporal base before using one-piece craniotomy. METHODS: By transposing the temporalis muscle underneath the zygomatic arch before osteotomy, the temporal base and the inferior orbital fissure can be fully exposed. Craniotomy is made in one piece with the frontotemporal and orbitozygomatic bone together by using a high-speed drill. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Osteotomy was easy and the cosmetic result was satisfactory. This technique also allows better access to the subtemporal region without removing the zygomatic arch.

Craniotomy