PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9457201

Primary breast abnormalities: selective pixel sampling on dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR images.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate a region-of-interest (ROI) analytic method that involves selective sampling of pixels within predetermined ranges of contrast material enhancement values ("thresholding") on magnetic resonance (MR) images of primary breast abnormalities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR images were obtained in 105 women. ROIs were drawn to outline the full extent of lesions. Relative signal intensity increase was determined on a pixel-by-pixel basis on 1- and 2-minute postcontrast images, as was the maximum relative signal intensity increase. Thresholding was used to analyze each ROI, with the upper boundary defined by the highest pixel value and lower boundaries of 0%-100%. RESULTS: Seventy-one invasive carcinomas and 37 benign lesions were analyzed. Narrower thresholding (i.e., larger percentage) resulted in an increase in all enhancement ratios (P < .0005). The enhancement ratio on 1-minute postcontrast images differed between benign lesions and carcinomas (P < .0005), but there were no significant differences in 2-minute and maximum ratios. Mean enhancement differences between benign and malignant lesions increased with narrower thresholding, but variability also increased linearly. Results of receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that thresholding did not affect the diagnostic usefulness of enhancement ratios. CONCLUSION: Contrary to current opinion, selective sampling of the most enhancing areas of breast abnormalities may not provide any diagnostic advantage over the use of easily drawn, lesion-encompassing ROIs.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S Mussurakis, P Gibbs, A Horsman. 1998. Primary breast abnormalities: selective pixel sampling on dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR images.. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.206.2.9457201

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Non-radical diagnostic biopsies do not negatively influence melanoma patient survival.

BACKGROUND: In fair-skinned Caucasian populations both the incidence and mortality rates of cutaneous melanoma have been increasing over the past decades. With adjuvant therapies still being under investigation, early detection is the only way to improve melanoma patient survival. The influence of incisional biopsies on melanoma patient survival has been discussed for many years. This study investigates both the influence of diagnostic biopsy type and the presence of residual tumor cells in the re-excision specimen on disease free and overall survival. METHODS: After (partial) removal of a pigmented skin lesion 471 patients were diagnosed with stage I/II melanoma and underwent re-excision and a sentinel node biopsy. All patients were followed prospectively, mean follow up >5 years. Patients were divided according to their diagnostic biopsy type (wide excision biopsy, narrow excision biopsy, excision biopsy with positive margins and incisional biopsy) and the presence of residual tumor cells in their re-excision specimen. Survival analysis was done using Cox's proportional hazard model adjusted for eight important confounders of melanoma patient survival. RESULTS: The diagnostic biopsy was wide in 279 patients, narrow in 109 patients, 52 patients underwent an excision biopsy with positive margins and 31 patients an incisional biopsy. In 41 patients residual tumor cells were present in the re-excision specimen. Both the diagnostic biopsy type and the presence of tumor cells in the re-excision specimen did not influence disease free and overall survival of melanoma patients. CONCLUSIONS: Non-radical diagnostic biopsies do not negatively influence melanoma patient survival.

Biopsy↗