PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9458335

Cell-cell communication in carcinogenesis.

Abstract

To explain the complex carcinogenic process by which a single normal cell in human beings can be converted to an invasive and metastatic cancer cell, a number of experimental findings, epidemiological observations and their associated hypothesis/theories have been integrated in this review. All cancers have been generally viewed as the result of a disruption of the homeostatic regulation of a cell's ability to respond appropriately to extra-cellular signals of the body which trigger intra-cellular signal transducting mechanisms which modulate gap junctional intercellular communication between the cells within a tissue. Normal homeostatic control of these three forms of cell communication determines whether: (a) the cell remains quiescent (Go); (b) enters into the cell proliferation phase; (c) is induced to differentiate; (d) is committed to apoptose; or (e) if it is already differentiated, it can adaptively respond. During the evolution from single cell organisms to multicellular organisms, new cellular/biological functions appeared, namely, the control of cell proliferation ("contact inhibition"), the appearance of the process of differentiation from committed stem cells of the various tissues and the need for programmed cell death or apoptosis. Interestingly, cancer cells have been characterized as cells: (a) having been derived from a stem-like cell; (b) without their ability to control cell growth or without the ability to contact inhibit; (c) which can not terminally differentiate under normal conditions; and (d) having altered ability to apoptosis under normal conditions. During that evolutionary transition from the single cell organism to the multicellular organism, many new genes appeared to accompany these new cellular functions. One of these new genes was the gene coding for a membrane associated protein channel (the gap junction) which between coupled cells, allowed the passive transfer on ions and small molecular weight molecules. A family of over a dozen of these highly evolutionarily-conserved genes (the connexin genes) coded for the connexin proteins. A hexameric unit of these connexins in one cell (a connexon) couples with a corresponding connexon in a contiguous cell to join the cytoplasms. This serves to synchronize either the metabolic or electrotonic functions of cells within a tissue. Most normal cells within solid tissues have functional gap junctional intercellular communication (GJIC) (exceptions are free-standing cells such as red blood cells, neutrophils, and several, if not all, the stem cells). On the other hand, the cancer cells of solid tissues appear to have either dysfunctional homologous or heterologous GJIC. Therefore, among the many differences between a cancer cell and its normal parental cell, the carcinogenic process involves the transition from a normal, GJIC-competent cell to one that is defective in GJIC. The review examines how GJIC can be either transiently or stably modulated by endogenous or exogenesis chemicals or by oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes at the transcriptional, translational, or posttranslational levels. It also uses the gap junction as the biological structure to facilitate cellular/tissue homeostasis to be the integrator for the "stem cell" theory, "disease of differentiation theory", "initiation/promotion/progression" concepts, nature and nurture concept of carcinogenesis, the mutation/ epigenetic theories of carcinogenesis, and the oncogene/ tumor suppressor gene theories of carcinogenesis. From this background, implications to cancer prevention and cancer therapy are generated.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J E Trosko, R J Ruch. 1998-02-15. Cell-cell communication in carcinogenesis.. https://doi.org/10.2741/a275

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Differential cell signaling testing for cell-cell communication inference from single-cell data by dominoSignal.

MOTIVATION: Algorithms for ligand-receptor network inference have emerged as commonly used tools to estimate cell-cell communication from reference single-cell data. Many studies employ these algorithms to compare signaling between conditions and lack methods to statistically identify signals that are significantly different. We previously developed the cell communication inference algorithm Domino, which considers ligand and receptor gene expression in association with downstream transcription factor activity scoring. We developed the dominoSignal software to innovate upon Domino and extend its functionality to test statistically differential cellular signaling. RESULTS: This new functionality includes the compilation of active signals as linkages from multiple subjects in a single-cell data set and testing condition-dependent signaling linkage. The software is applicable for analysis of single-cell data sets with multiple subjects as biological replicates as well as with bootstrapped replicates from data sets with few or pooled subjects. We use simulation studies to benchmark the number of subjects in compared groups and cells within an annotated cell type sufficient to accurately identify differential linkages. We demonstrate the application of the Differential Cell Signaling Test (DCST) in the dominoSignal software to investigate consequences of cancer cell phenotypes and immunotherapy on cell-cell communication in tumor microenvironments. These applications in cancer studies demonstrate the ability of differential cell signaling analysis to infer changes to cell communication networks from therapeutic or experimental perturbations, which is broadly applicable across biological systems. AVAILABILITY: dominoSignal is available through Bioconductor at https://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/dominoSignal.html.

Cell Communication↗

ZAP-70 kinase regulates HIV cell-to-cell spread and virological synapse formation.

HIV efficiently spreads in lymphocytes, likely through virological synapses (VSs). These cell-cell junctions share some characteristics with immunological synapses, but cellular proteins required for their constitution remain poorly characterized. We have examined here the role of ZAP-70, a key kinase regulating T-cell activation and immunological synapse formation, in HIV replication. In lymphocytes deficient for ZAP-70, or expressing a kinase-dead mutant of the protein, HIV replication was strikingly delayed. We have characterized further this replication defect. ZAP-70 was dispensable for the early steps of viral cycle, from entry to expression of viral proteins. However, in the absence of ZAP-70, intracellular Gag localization was impaired. ZAP-70 was required in infected donor cells for efficient cell-to-cell HIV transmission to recipients and for formation of VSs. These results bring novel insights into the links that exist between T-cell activation and HIV spread, and suggest that HIV usurps components of the immunological synapse machinery to ensure its own spread through cell-to-cell contacts.

Cell Communication↗

Gap junctional intercellular communication capacity by gap-FRAP technique: a comparative study.

Gap junctions play an important role in vital functions, including the regulation of cell growth and cell differentiation. Connexins 43 (Cx43) are the most widely expressed gap junction proteins. Cellular localization of phosphorylated Cx43 has been implicated in the capacity of gap junctional intercellular communication (GJIC). To follow the functionality of GJIC of different cell types, in monolayer cultures, characterized by different patterns of phosphorylated Cx43, we used a fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) technique, and compared two tracers, 5(6)-carboxyfluorescein diacetate (CFDA) and calcein acetoxymethylester (AM). The GJIC capacity was quantified by estimating fluorescence redistribution parameters. The functionality of GJIC was in relation with the staining localization of phosphorylated Cx43 to the cell-cell contact areas, corresponding to gap junctions between contacting cells. GJIC involvement in fluorescence restitution after photobleaching was checked by a gap junction channel inhibition assay. We demonstrated that the choice of the dye did not significantly influence the fluorescence recovery percentages despite a cell line-dependent CFDA release, whereas it had an important impact on fluorescence kinetic profiles. This study reinforces the interest of the gap-FRAP approach to quantify modifications in the functionality of gap junctions and, above all, argues about the limits of CFDA for 3-D future approaches.

Cell Communication↗