PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 9464579

Left ventricular assist devices: current status and future applications.

J Parameshwar·J Wallwork
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Despite the advances in the medical management of heart failure over the last 20 years it remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality. While cardiac transplantation has evolved into an established mode of therapy, the number of patients with severe heart failure who could benefit from cardiac transplantation far exceeds the supply of donor organs. The development of an implantable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) began in the early 1970s in centres such as the Texas Heart Institute and was funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Clinical trials of these devices began in the mid 1980s and several hundred patients have now been supported with one or other of these devices. Most patients have had an LVAD implanted as a bridge to cardiac transplantation. Recently there has also been interest in the use of an LVAD for (a) permanent ventricular support and (b) as a bridge to recovery in patients with potentially reversible causes of heart failure.

Explore related subjects

Heart FailureHeart TransplantationHeart-Assist DevicesHumansInfectionsProsthesis DesignProsthesis FailureThromboembolismVentricular Dysfunction, RightJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Parameshwar, J Wallwork. 1997-12-01. Left ventricular assist devices: current status and future applications.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-5273(97)00208-8

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Elevated 5-oxoproline levels and adverse outcomes in heart failure: Association with renal cortical OPLAH loss in a multi-comorbidity model.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) progression is closely linked to oxidative stress. 5-Oxoproline (5-OP), a product of glutathione degradation, is normally metabolized by 5-oxoprolinase (OPLAH) but accumulates when the gamma-glutamyl cycle is disrupted. Here, we investigated the clinical characteristics of circulating 5-OP, its proteomic correlates, and the associations to outcome in HF. METHODS: In serum of 823 BIOSTAT-CHF patients, 5-OP was quantified by validated liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and analyzed for associations with clinical outcomes. Proteomic correlates were identified across 355 OLINK proteins using stability selection with Minimax Concave Penalty regression. Mechanistic context was evaluated in a multi-comorbidity, large-animal cardio-kidney-metabolic (CKM) model with regional OPLAH assessment. RESULTS: Higher 5-OP was associated with worse renal function (eGFR declining across 5-OP tertiles, 67.9 to 60.2 mL/min/1.73 m2; p = 0.0012) and higher all-cause mortality (HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.11-2.17, p = 0.010). Per SD increase in log-5-OP, risk for the 2-year composite endpoint increased (HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.05-1.53), with broadly similar associations across CKD strata (interaction p = 0.63). TGF-α was the most robust proteomic correlate (π = 0.70; empirical permutation p = 0.001). In CKM swine, circulating 5-OP was elevated and renal cortical OPLAH protein, but not cardiac OPLAH, was selectively reduced, consistent with a renal contribution to systemic 5-OP elevation. CONCLUSION: Circulating 5-OP identifies HF patients at higher risk and is robustly associated with TGF-α. In a translational swine model, selective loss of renal cortical OPLAH provides tissue context supporting a renal contribution to systemic 5-OP elevation in cardiorenal syndrome.

Heart Failure↗
PubMed2026

Select Contemporary Statistical Concepts in Heart Failure Clinical Trials: Insights From the Heart Failure Collaboratory.

Evolving statistical concepts and innovative trial designs for heart failure (HF) clinical trials seek to improve the conduct, efficiency, and likelihood of meaningful evidence generation crucial for advancing therapeutic development and optimizing patient care. HF trials with conventional statistical frameworks often require large sample sizes, long follow-up times, and high cost to generate sufficient evidence. Novel statistical methodologies would be of interest if they could address these issues while retaining or enhancing the clinical relevance and reliability of results. The HFC (Heart Failure Collaboratory), comprising clinical investigators, clinicians, statisticians, patients, government representatives, payors, and industry collaborators, leads efforts to improve HF research methodologies. HFC discussions have included statistical concepts such as the estimand framework, HR drift, and analytic methods, including the win ratio and restricted mean survival time, that have not been used frequently in HF trials. The estimand framework encourages precise definition and alignment of trial objectives with trial design. The win ratio method attempts to incorporate and prioritize multiple clinically meaningful outcomes by using a hierarchy of clinical importance. The restricted mean survival time provides an alternative to the HR as a measure of therapeutic effect by quantifying the mean time gained or lost during a fixed time after randomization. This paper provides a critical review of some evolving HF trial design methodologies and statistical concepts for the HF community as discussed within the HFC. Our goal is to foster collaboration among diverse stakeholders and advance the development of effective treatments and improve patient care outcomes.

Heart Failure↗
PubMed2006

[Circulatory mechanical support. State of the art].

Despite advances in medical treatment, the prognosis of advanced heart failure remains poor. The number of hospitalizations for heart failure exacerbations continues to increase and most patients will ultimately die of complications related to heart failure. Implantable left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) are currently in use throughout the world with increasing frequency. This paper is a comprehensive review about mechanical support, focusing on a general description of the different LVAD, complications and mortality.

Heart Failure↗