PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 9476201

Using information management to implement a clinical resource management program.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This article provides a consultant's account of a 250-bed community hospital's experience in implementing the Clinical Resource Management (CRM) program, a four-stage process of using information to identify opportunities for improvement, developing an effective resource management team, implementing process improvement activities, and measuring the impact on outcomes of care. CASE STUDY EXAMPLE--CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE: The chair of the departments of internal medicine and family practice selected congestive heart failure for in-depth study. A task force focused on treatment and patient disposition in the emergency room (ER), where most of the nonelective admissions originated. A set of standardized ER orders was developed that emphasized rapid and effective diuresis through the initiation of a progressive diuretic dosing schedule directly linked to patient response. LESSONS AND REFLECTIONS: Factors critical to the success of the CRM program included allocating adequate time to promote and sell the value and importance of the program, as well as securing the support of both information systems and physicians. The main barriers to success involved limitations in the information system infrastructure and delays attributable to committee review. Short-term results from the CRM program were encouraging, with average lengths of stay reduced by 0.5 days and average costs of care reduced by 12% for the ten diagnoses studied with no adverse results. Nonstudy diagnoses showed no notable improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Recognizing the growing importance of information management not only for clinical decision support but for accommodating all the necessary internal and external reporting requirements will require a significant commitment and investment in technology and personnel resources.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A H Rosenstein. 1997. Using information management to implement a clinical resource management program.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30347-9

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Salvaged femoral heads banked for re-use. Excellent bone replacement in revision of prosthetic surgery].

Morsellized and compacted femoral heads salvaged after hip arthroplasty constitute an excellent bone replacement material. Access to this material has substantially improved prognosis following replacement of loosened prostheses, a finding contrary to previous experience with uncompacted bone grafts and for which only hypothetical explanations are available. Although bank bone is a material without manifest value beyond its material properties, it is sometimes referred to as a transplant, a usage that has resulted in its occasional use under the misapprehension that it will promote bone repair, which may cause problems. Otherwise, bank bone is more or less innocuous and is not associated with a greater risk of viral infection transmission than is blood transfusion. The article provides a review of the biological effects to be expected of bank bone implants, how the risk of infection can be avoided, and which indications are appropriate.

Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip

Total hip arthroplasty for osteonecrosis: matched-pair analysis of 188 hips with long-term follow-up.

A matched comparison was made between total hip arthroplasties done for osteonecrosis and those done for osteoarthritis. Patients were matched for age, sex, surgical approach, prosthesis, and surgeon. All received cemented Charnley replacements and had minimal follow-up of 10 years. There were 118 women and 70 men with a mean age of 58 years. Thirty-five patients were younger than 50. The mean follow-up was 17.8 years (range, 10 to 25.4 years). Revision rates for osteonecrosis and osteoarthritis were 18% and 19% (not significant). The mechanical failure rate (revision for loosening plus radiographic loosening) was greater, but not significantly so, in the osteonecrosis group. In patients younger than 50 years, the revision rate in osteonecrosis (50%) was significantly higher than that in any other group. Similarly, the mechanical failure rate in osteonecrosis was significantly greater in the patients younger than 50. Radiographic femoral loosening was greater in osteonecrosis at all follow-up intervals, and dislocations occurred more frequently in the osteonecrosis group than in the osteoarthritis group. Results of arthroplasty in both groups were comparable in patients over 50 years of age, although patients with osteonecrosis had an increased rate of dislocation. Patients with osteonecrosis who are younger than 50 years have a significantly higher rate of mechanical failure than those with osteoarthritis who are younger than 50 years. Cemented total hip arthroplasty should be recommended in this group with caution if at all.

Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip