PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9494836

Multiple drug-resistant tuberculosis.

Abstract

The national and international emergence of drug-resistant M. tuberculosis has complicated both the programmatic control of the tuberculosis epidemic and the clinical management of individual cases. In the United States, the problem of MDR tuberculosis is regionalized and likely stems from multifactorial causes, including the concurrent HIV epidemic. The epidemic is propagated by two distinct entities, PDR and ADR tuberculosis, which result from different inadequacies in tuberculosis control programs. The clinical management of drug-resistant tuberculosis, MDR tuberculosis in particular, is complex, frequently results in adverse outcomes, and often necessitates consultation with a specialist in the field. Two important management principles are to always use at least two agents to which the organism is susceptible and to never add a single drug to a failing regimen. Selection of an appropriate treatment regimen and determination of the duration of therapy depend on the resistance pattern, toxicities of the drugs, and the patient's response to therapy. Measures to ensure patient adherence with therapy are of paramount importance in the setting of drug resistance. Preventive therapy should be considered in the management of close contacts to active cases of MDR tuberculosis, although there is little evidence to support this practice.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

W Z Bradford, C L Daley. 1998. Multiple drug-resistant tuberculosis.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0891-5520(05)70415-3

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Low-cost rapid detection of rifampicin resistant tuberculosis using bacteriophage in Kampala, Uganda.

BACKGROUND: Resistance to anti-tuberculosis drugs is a serious public health problem. Multi-drug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB), defined as resistance to at least rifampicin and isoniazid, has been reported in all regions of the world. Current phenotypic methods of assessing drug susceptibility of M. tuberculosis are slow. Rapid molecular methods to detect resistance to rifampicin have been developed but they are not affordable in some high prevalence countries such as those in sub Saharan Africa. A simple multi-well plate assay using mycobacteriophage D29 has been developed to test M. tuberculosis isolates for resistance to rifampicin. The purpose of this study was to investigate the performance of this technology in Kampala, Uganda. METHODS: In a blinded study 149 M. tuberculosis isolates were tested for resistance to rifampicin by the phage assay and results compared to those from routine phenotypic testing in BACTEC 460. Three concentrations of drug were used 2, 4 and 10 microg/ml. Isolates found resistant by either assay were subjected to sequence analysis of a 81 bp fragment of the rpoB gene to identify mutations predictive of resistance. Four isolates with discrepant phage and BACTEC results were tested in a second phenotypic assay to determine minimal inhibitory concentrations. RESULTS: Initial analysis suggested a sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 96.5% respectively for the phage assay used at 4 and 10 microg/ml when compared to the BACTEC 460. However, further analysis revealed 4 false negative results from the BACTEC 460 and the phage assay proved the more sensitive and specific of the two tests. Of the 39 isolates found resistant by the phage assay 38 (97.4%) were found to have mutations predictive of resistance in the 81 bp region of the rpoB gene. When used at 2 mug/ml false resistant results were observed from the phage assay. The cost of reagents for testing each isolate was estimated to be 1.3 US dollars when testing a batch of 20 isolates on a single 96 well plate. Results were obtained in 48 hours. CONCLUSION: The phage assay can be used for screening of isolates for resistance to rifampicin, with high sensitivity and specificity in Uganda. The test may be useful in poorly resourced laboratories as a rapid screen to differentiate between rifampicin susceptible and potential MDR-TB cases.

Antibiotics, Antitubercular↗

Stereoselective analysis of hydroxybupropion and application to drug interaction studies.

A sensitive and stereoselective assay has been developed for the quantitation of the enantiomers of hydroxybupropion, an active metabolite of bupropion, in human plasma. The assay used liquid-liquid extraction and a Cyclobond I 2000 HPLC column with a mobile phase containing 3% acetonitrile, 0.5% triethylamine, and 20 mM ammonium acetate (pH 3.8). The technique was linear over the concentration range of 12.5-500 ng/ml for (2R,3R)- and (2S,3S)-hydroxybupropion. The method was reproducible as both interday and intraday variabilities were less than 10% for both hydroxybupropion enantiomers. Overall extraction recovery of hydroxybupropion enantiomers and the internal standard phenacetin from plasma was greater than 80% and reproducible over the concentration range of 12.5-500 ng/ml for each enantiomer. The limit of quantification (LOQ) of hydroxybupropion enantiomers was 12.5 ng/ml. The stereoselective pharmacokinetics of both (2R,3R)- and (2S,3S)-hydroxybupropion in healthy male subjects (n = 16) were investigated after a single dose of (rac)-bupropion either alone or during rifampicin administration. (2R,3R)-Hydroxybupropion was the predominant enantiomer present in plasma. A stereoselective effect of rifampicin on hydroxybupropion concentrations was observed, with rifampicin influencing the pharmacokinetics of each hydroxybupropion enantiomer in a different manner. The ratio of (2R,3R)-hydroxybupropion (AUC(0-24)) to (2S,3S)-hydroxybupropion (AUC(0-24)) increased from 4.9 +/- 1.6 to 8.3 +/- 1.9 during rifampicin administration (P < 0.001). A time-dependent change in the hydroxybupropion enantiomeric ratio was observed after (rac)-bupropion administration both before and during rifampicin coadministration, with an increase in the relative proportion of (2S,3S)-hydroxybupropion over the 24 h postdose period.

Antibiotics, Antitubercular↗

Use of the INNO LiPA Rif.TB for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA directly in clinical specimens and for simultaneous determination of rifampin susceptibility.

The INNO LiPA Rif.TB (Innogenetics, Ghent, Belgium) is a reverse hybridization test developed to detect genetic markers of resistance to rifampin in Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. In the present study, this test was used directly on 3,763 clinical specimens by adopting a nested amplification of the target. The specificity of the system (98.4%) was optimal, but sensitivity (69.5%) was unsatisfactory. However, when use of the system was limited to smear-positive specimens, the sensitivity rose to 91.7%. As expected, the ability of the system to predict rifampin resistance was not influenced by its direct use on clinical specimens and confirmed the favorable results repeatedly reported in the literature.

Antibiotics, Antitubercular↗