PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 9496630

Human abilities.

Abstract

This chapter reviews recent literature, primarily from the 1990s, on human abilities. The review opens with a consideration of the question of what intelligence is, and then considers some of the major definitions of intelligence, as well as implicit theories of intelligence around the world. Next, the chapter considers cognitive approaches to intelligence, and then biological approaches. It proceeds to psychometric or traditional approaches to intelligence, and then to broad, recent approaches. The different approaches raise somewhat different questions, and hence produce somewhat different answers. They have in common, however, the attempt to understand what kinds of mechanisms lead some people to adapt to, select, and shape environments in ways that match particularly well the demands of those environments.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R J Sternberg, J C Kaufman. 1998. Human abilities.. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.479

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Expert memory: a comparison of four theories.

This paper compares four current theories of expertise with respect to chess players' memory: Chase and Simon's chunking theory, Holding's SEEK theory, Ericsson and Kintsch's long-term working memory theory, and Gobet and Simon's template theory (Chase, W.G., Simon, H.A., 1973a. Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology 4, 55-81; Holding, D.H., 1985. The Psychology of Chess Skill. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ; Ericsson, K.A., Kintsch, W., 1995. Long-term working memory. Psychological Review 102, 211-245; Gobet, F., Simon, H.A., 1996b. Templates in chess memory: a mechanism for recalling several boards. Cognitive Psychology 31, 1-40). The empirical areas showing the largest discriminative power include recall of random and distorted positions, recall with very short presentation times, and interference studies. Contrary to recurrent criticisms in the literature, it is shown that the chunking theory is consistent with most of the data. However, the best performance in accounting for the empirical evidence is obtained by the template theory. The theory, which unifies low-level aspects of cognition, such as chunks, with high-level aspects, such as schematic knowledge and planning, proposes that chunks are accessed through a discrimination net, where simple perceptual features are tested, and that they can evolve into more complex data structures (templates) specific to classes of positions. Implications for the study of expertise in general include the need for detailed process models of expert behavior and the need to use empirical data spanning the traditional boundaries of perception, memory, and problem solving.

Aptitude

Inventory-derived task handedness preferences of nine professions and their associations with self-report global handedness preferences.

The handedness preference (laterality) of 1,196 professionals grouped in nine professions previously reported using self-reported global handedness and scores on a modified Edinburgh Handedness Inventory was further defined by evaluating the association between profession and the 10 manual tasks of the inventory. The previously reported ranking of professions in order of increasing righthandedness of laterality score arose from the handedness of specific inventory tasks. A similar association was found for self-reported global handedness. The evidence continues to support the hypothesis of an association between handedness preference and specific aptitudes or skills in this sample of professional persons.

Aptitude

[Motivation and psychological suitability for work in a pediatric intensive care unit].

During interviews with physicians and nurses on the general pediatric intensive care unit (ICU) of the University of Heidelberg Children's Hospital personnel reported on various aspects of their work. One complex of questions dealt with the motivation to work in intensive medicine. Physicians and nurses showed different patterns of motivation. Physicians could be clearly divided into those who found intensive medicine fascinating and those who tended to fear it. Nurses' motivation is multifaceted and differentiated. The information gained from the interviews questions the sense of obligating physicians without interest or aptitude to rotate to an ICU during their specialty training in pediatrics. This policy is associated with corresponding risks for patients. The work of often superiorly qualified nurses becomes more difficult.

Aptitude