PubMed · 9500745
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
A M Vignola, M Gjomarkaj, B Arnoux, J Bousquet. 1998. Monocytes.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0091-6749(98)70378-1
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Our understanding of the host factors that determine susceptibility and progression of HIV infection has been very limited. In particular, it has been not clear why some people remain uninfected being repeatedly exposed to HIV-1, and others who have been infected by HIV, remain clinically asymptomatic for long periods of time. Recently it has been demonstrated that mutated forms of a number of chemokine receptors that act as coreceptors for HIV-1 entry may account for some of these phenomena. Furthermore, chemokines such as RANTES and others, being the natural ligands for chemokine receptors, have been shown to be effective inhibitors of HIV-1 infection. In this review we discuss some of the genetic, immunological, virological and epidemiological data relevant to the very important role chemokines and chemokine receptors play in HIV pathogenesis with special reference to the increased susceptibility of the African host to HIV infection.
The recent discovery of chemokine receptors as coreceptors for human immunodeficiency virus-type 1 (HIV-1) entry offers new avenues for investigating the pathogenesis of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)-related cytopenias. To this end, we sought to (1) phenotype human hematopoietic cells for CD4 and the HIV-1 coreceptors CXCR4, CCR5, CCR3, and CCR2b; (2) correlate CD4 and chemokine receptor expression with their susceptibility to HIV-1 infection; and (3) examine any potential interplay between inflammatory cytokines released during HIV-1 infection and regulation of chemokine receptor expression. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis of bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMNC), cells derived from serum-free expanded hematopoietic lineages (colony-forming unit-granulocyte-macrophage [CFU-GM], colony-forming unit-megakaryocyte [CFU-Meg], and burst-forming unit-erythroid [BFU-E]), and CD34(+) cells showed differential expression of chemokine receptors and CD4 with some lineage specificity. Significantly, FACS-sorted CXCR4(+)/CD34(+) cells had the same clonogeneic potential as CXCR4(-)/CD34(+) cells. Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis of FACS-sorted human candidate stem cells (HSC; CD34(+), c-kit+, Rho123(low)) showed the presence of CXCR4 mRNA but not CD4 mRNA. Infection studies with HIV-1 Env-pseudotyped luciferase reporter viruses indicated that X4 Env (CXCR4-using) pseudotypes infected megakaryocytic cells, whereas R5 Env (CCR5-using) pseudotypes did not. Similarly, R5 but not X4 Env-pseudotyped viruses infected granulocyte-macrophage cells in a CD4/CCR5-dependent manner. Erythroid cells were resistant to R5 or X4 viral infection. Finally, we found that gamma-interferon treatment upregulated CXCR4 expression on primary hematopoietic cells. In summary, the delineation of chemokine receptor expression on primary hematopoietic cells is a first step towards dissecting the chemokine-chemokine receptor axes that may play a role in hematopoietic cell proliferation and homing. Furthermore, susceptibility of hematopoietic cells to HIV-1 infection is likely to be more complicated than the mere physical presence of CD4 and the cognate chemokine receptor. Lastly, our results suggest a potential interplay between gamma-interferon secretion and CXCR4 expression.
Dendritic cells (DC) have been showed to both produce and respond to chemokines. To understand how this may impact on DC function, we analyzed the kinetics of chemokine production and responsiveness during DC maturation. After stimulation with LPS, TNF-alpha or CD40 ligand, the inflammatory chemokines MIP-1alpha, MIP-1beta and IL-8 were produced rapidly and at high levels, but only for a few hours, while RANTES and MCP-1 were produced in a sustained fashion. The constitutive chemokines TARC, MDC and PARC were expressed in immature DC and were up-regulated following maturation, while ELC was produced only at late time points. Activated macrophages produced a similar spectrum of chemokines, but did not produce TARC and ELC. In maturing DC chemokine production had different impact on chemokine receptor function. While CCR1 and CCR5 were down-regulated by endogenous or exogenous chemokines, CCR7 levels gradually increased in maturing DC and showed a striking resistance to ligand-induced down-regulation, explaining how DC can sustain the response to SLC and ELC throughout the maturation process. The time-ordered production of inflammatory and constitutive chemokines provides DC with the capacity to self-regulate their migratory behavior as well as to recruit other cells for the afferent and efferent limb of the immune response.