PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 9507979

Auditory processing and dyslexia: evidence for a specific speech processing deficit.

G Schulte-Körne·W Deimel·J Bartling·H Remschmidt
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In order to investigate the relationship between dyslexia and central auditory processing, 19 children with spelling disability and 15 controls at grades 5 and 6 were examined using a passive oddball paradigm. Mismatch negativity (MMN) was determined for tone and speech stimuli. While there were no group differences for the tone stimuli, we found a significantly attenuated MMN in the dyslexic group for the speech stimuli. This finding leads to the conclusion that dyslexics have a specific speech processing deficit at the sensory level which could be used to identify children at risk at an early age.

Explore related subjects

Acoustic StimulationBrain MappingChildDyslexiaElectroencephalographyHumansReadingSpeech PerceptionClinical TrialJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G Schulte-Körne, W Deimel, J Bartling, H Remschmidt. 1998-01-26. Auditory processing and dyslexia: evidence for a specific speech processing deficit.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-199801260-00029

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1999

Independent control of head and gaze movements during head-free pursuit in humans.

1. Head and gaze movements are usually highly co-ordinated. Here we demonstrate that under certain circumstances they can be controlled independently and we investigate the role of anticipatory activity in this process. 2. In experiment 1, subjects tracked, with head and eyes, a sinusoidally moving target. Overall, head and gaze trajectories were tightly coupled. From moment to moment, however, the trajectories could be very different and head movements were significantly more variable than gaze movements. 3. Predictive head and gaze responses can be elicited by repeated presentation of an intermittently illuminated, constant velocity target. In experiment 2 this protocol elicited a build-up of anticipatory head and gaze velocity, in opposing directions, when subjects made head movements in the opposite direction to target movement whilst maintaining gaze on target. 4. In experiment 3, head and gaze movements were completely uncoupled. Subjects followed, with head and gaze, respectively, two targets moving at different, harmonically unrelated frequencies. This was possible when both targets were visual, and also when gaze followed a visual target at one frequency whilst the head was oscillated in time with an auditory tone modulated at the second frequency. 5. We conclude that these results provide evidence of a visuomotor predictive mechanism that continuously samples visual feedback information and stores it such that it can be accessed by either the eye or the head to generate anticipatory movements. This overcomes time delays in visuomotor processing and facilitates time-sharing of motor activities, making possible the performance of two tasks simultaneously.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1999

Effects of stimulus frequency and intensity on c-fos mRNA expression in the adult rat auditory brainstem.

Induction of the cellular fos gene (c-fos) is one of the earliest transcriptional changes observed following neuronal excitation. Although not an activity marker in the strict electrophysiological sense, many neurons in the central nervous system increase their c-fos expression after periods of sustained stimulation at physiological levels of intensity. In the present study, induction of c-fos mRNA expression was examined in the auditory brainstem after 1 hour of continuous free-field acoustic stimulation. Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed to pure tones of 2, 8, 16, or 32 kHz or half-octave noise bands centered on 2, 8, or 32 kHz at 80-120 dB SPL. Stimulation-induced c-fos mRNA expression was evident at all levels of the auditory brainstem, and this expression was intensity dependent. In some brain areas, induced expression manifested a clear tonotopic organization, i.e., in dorsal, posteroventral, and anteroventral cochlear nuclei, and in the medial nucleus of the trapezoid body. The inferior colliculus exhibited multiple tonotopic representations. The dorsal nucleus of the lateral lemniscus had a crude tonotopy. Although expression was present, tonotopy was not evident in periolivary nuclei or in the ventral or intermediate nuclei of the lateral lemniscus. Free-field diotic stimulation did not induce c-fos mRNA expression in the medial or lateral superior olivary nuclei. Expression was induced in the lateral superior olive by dichotic stimulation (after a unilateral cochlear ablation), and that expression was tonotopically organized. The results suggest that stimulation-induced c-fos mRNA expression can be an effective way of mapping neuronal activity in the central auditory system under both normal and pathological conditions.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1999

Cochlear ablation alters acoustically induced c-fos mRNA expression in the adult rat auditory brainstem.

Expression of c-fos mRNA was studied in the adult rat brain following cochlear ablations by using in situ hybridization. In normal animals, expression was produced by acoustic stimulation and was found to be tonotopically distributed in many auditory nuclei. Following unilateral cochlear ablation, acoustically driven expression was eliminated or decreased in areas normally activated by the ablated ear, e.g., the ipsilateral dorsal and ventral cochlear nuclei, dorsal periolivary nuclei, and lateral nucleus of the trapezoid body and the contralateral medial and ventral nuclei of the trapezoid body, lateral lemniscal nuclei, and inferior colliculus. These deficits did not recover, even after long survivals up to 6 months. Results also indicated that neurons in the dorsal cochlear nucleus could be activated by contralateral stimulation in the absence of ipsilateral cochlear input and that the influence of the contralateral ear was tonotopically organized. Results also indicated that c-fos expression rose rapidly and persisted for up to 6 months in neurons in the rostral part of the contralateral medial nucleus of the trapezoid body following a cochlear ablation, even in the absence of acoustic stimulation. This response may reflect a release of constitutive excitatory inputs normally suppressed by missing afferent input or changes in homeostatic gene expression related to sensory deprivation. Instances of transient, surgery-dependent increases in c-fos mRNA expression in the absence of acoustic stimulation were observed in the superficial dorsal cochlear nucleus and the cochlear nerve root on the ablated side.

Acoustic Stimulation↗