PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 9509270

Clostridium difficile infection.

C P Kelly·J T LaMont
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Clostridium difficile infection is associated with broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy and is the most common cause of infectious diarrhea in hospital patients. Pathogenic strains of C. difficile produce two protein exotoxins, toxin A and toxin B, which cause colonic mucosal injury and inflammation. Infection may be asymptomatic, cause mild diarrhea, or result in severe pseudomembranous colitis. Diagnosis depends on the demonstration of C. difficile toxins in the stool. The first step in management is to discontinue the antibiotic that caused diarrhea. If diarrhea and colitis are severe or persistent, oral metronidazole is the treatment of choice. Oral vancomycin is also effective, but it is more expensive than metronidazole and its widespread use may encourage the proliferation of vancomycin-resistant nosocomial bacteria. Diarrhea and colitis usually improve within three days after a patient starts taking metronidazole or vancomycin, but 20% suffer a relapse of diarrhea when these agents are discontinued.

Explore related subjects

Administration, OralAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ToxinsClostridioides difficileColonDiarrheaDrug CostsDrug Resistance, MicrobialEnterocolitis, PseudomembranousExotoxinsFecesHospitalizationHumansIntestinal MucosaMetronidazoleRecurrenceTime FactorsVancomycinJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C P Kelly, J T LaMont. 1998. Clostridium difficile infection.. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.med.49.1.375

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2005

Effects of L-DOPA on aggressive behavior and central monoaminergic activity in the lizard Anolis carolinensis, using a new method for drug delivery.

The dopamine (DA) precursor, L-DOPA (500 microg), was injected into living crickets, which were ingested (one each) by adult male Anolis carolinensis. This method of delivery elevated plasma L-DOPA and DA concentrations by approximately 1000-fold. In contrast, plasma epinephrine (Epi) and norepinephrine (NE) were not influenced by L-DOPA treatment, although they were elevated following the consumption of the cricket. Lizards that ingested L-DOPA treated crickets had elevated L-DOPA in all brain regions measured, with DA and/or DOPAC also increased significantly in most brain regions studied. Despite increased DA levels in the striatum and nucleus accumbens as a response to L-DOPA, the treatment had no influence on general motor activity. Central serotonin, NE, and Epi systems were not affected in any brain region by oral L-DOPA treatment. In addition, aggression was inhibited by this dose of L-DOPA, even though there was no effect on serotonergic systems. This is surprising because controlling aggressive behavior is usually considered the province of serotonergic activity. Aggression was measured before and after treatment, and while saline-treated lizards retained the full vigor of aggressive activity, those fed a cricket injected with L-DOPA were only one-third as aggressive after treatment. As L-DOPA treatment did not affect general motor activity, the effect appears to be directly associated with aggression. This is supported by the observation that L-DOPA treatment delayed latency to eyespot darkening, which predicts the latency to aggression.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2005

Intravenous 6-mercaptopurine decreases salvage after relapse in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a report from the Children's Cancer Group study CCG 1922.

PURPOSE: To compare outcomes of patients with NCI standard risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who relapsed after being randomized to receive either oral or intravenous 6-mercaptopurine (6MP) in the Children's Cancer Group study CCG 1922. PATIENTS AND METHODS: CCG 1922 accrued patients from March 1993 to August 1995. A total of 1,060 patients were randomly assigned to four treatment groups: oral 6MP plus prednisone (OP), intravenous 6MP plus prednisone (IP), oral 6MP plus dexamethasone (OD), and intravenous 6MP plus dexamethasone (ID). During the 2nd through 4th month of therapy groups OP and OD were treated with 75 mg/m(2)/day of oral 6MP for 70 days and groups IP and ID with 1,000 mg/m(2)/week of intravenous 6MP over 10 hr for 11 doses. All patients received a single delayed intensification and all received oral 6MP in maintenance. RESULTS: Patients randomized to oral 6MP had significantly better 5-year overall survival (96 +/- 1% vs. 92 +/- 1%; P = 0.008). There was, however, no statistically significant difference in the event-free survival (EFS). Of the 179 patients who relapsed, 84 had a second or later event and 68 have died. Forty of the 84 second events were a death. Survival after relapse was significantly greater for patients randomized to oral 6MP during consolidation than those receiving intravenous 6MP (P = 0.002, log rank test) with 4-year survival post-relapse of 67 +/- 6% vs. 48 +/- 6%. The steroid randomization had no influence on outcome. Post-relapse therapy details are not available and if different between groups may have influenced the outcome. CONCLUSION: Treatment with intravenous 6MP during a brief period of total therapy had a significant negative impact on the prognosis in childhood ALL even though oral 6MP was used during maintenance.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2005

[Neurological complications and loss of efficacy with intrathecal pain therapy].

In a new guideline issued by the German Association for the Study of Pain, intrathecal opioid therapy is described as proven to be effective with relatively few side effects. We reviewed this statement by analysis of the available literature and critical evaluation of the clinical course in a few of our own patients (n=3). In these cases (as well as in a further eight patients), explantation and a switch to oral opioids led to distinctly better alleviation of pain and abatement of the unwanted effects. The problems we discuss do not appear to be rare instances, but by all means complications that are frequently described. The long-term efficacy of intrathecal opioids has not been adequately verified; moreover, their potency is not high. The frequency of undesired events is comparable to that of oral opioid medication, but serious neurological complications are possible. To avoid dose escalations and to recognize neurological complications in time, diligent monitoring by the surgeon or an experienced pain center is essential.

Administration, Oral↗