PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 9513701

Computerization in the OR.

Abstract

This article highlights the process of establishing a computerized scheduling and materials management system in a surgical department. The following facets of the computerization process are discussed: options staff members should consider when choosing a computer system, the importance of scheduling and inventory control, cost savings, how computer systems work when using electronic data interchange and bar coding, and case studies.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L J Bird. 1997. Computerization in the OR.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0001-2092(06)62800-7

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Unscheduled revisits in medical emergency units at the hospital: incidence and related factors].

BACKGROUND: To known the revisit rate in an emergency department (ED), to define the clinical and epidemiological profile of revisited patients, and to identify influencing factors for revisits. PATIENTS AND METHODS: During one year period, we included all revisited patients returning to ED before 72 h of a previous discharge from medical unit of ED. As controls we included the next patient seen after every case being discharged. We compiled clinical and epidemiological data from both groups. For revisited patients, we identify the cause of the revisit, changes in diagnosis and/or treatment, diagnosis mistakes and final destination of the patient. RESULTS: We identified 406 revisits (revisit rate: 1.42%). Multivariate analysis disclosed, as positive predictive factors for revisit, and age over 60 years (p = 0.006), male sex (p = 0.02), visit performed at level 2 (severe diseases) (p = 0.02), initial assessment by junior resident (p = 0.01), number of complementary procedures higher than 2 (p = 0.01) and gastrointestinal disease as diagnosis after the first visit (p = 0.03). On the other hand, dermatologic symptoms as initial complaint and unspecific symptoms (p = 0.01) were negative predictors for revisit. In only 16% of cases, the revisit did not imply changes in the diagnosis or treatment. Revisits were due to disease-related factors in 34% of cases, physician-related factors in 33%, patients-related factors in 10%, system-related factors in 3% and there were no relationship with the previous visit in 15% (in 5% of cases the cause was unassessable). The diagnosis error most frequently seen was "nonspecific abdominal syndrome". Seventy six percent of revisited patients were admitted. CONCLUSIONS: The revisit rate in our ED is relatively low. Patients being revisited have well-defined clinical and epidemiological profile. The majority of revisited patients require to be admitted.

Appointments and Schedules

A survey of dental practitioners on their use of electronic mail.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility of using electronic-mail as a tool for surveying dental practitioners; to determine both response rates and response times for this method; and provide baseline information on e-mail usage. METHOD: Self-administered questionnaire distributed by e-mail to 309 practitioners on Monday morning, 1 June 1998. RESULTS: 53.4% response rate within 1 month; 10.2% of replies were sent within 2 hours; and nearly half the replies were sent within 48 hours. Qualified dentists were more likely to respond early than undergraduates. The most popular point of access for e-mail was home (69.1%). The majority of responders (56.8%) use e-mail every day with 1 in 7 (14.2%) using it at least four times a day. 72.4% stated that they found e-mail useful for communicating with professional bodies, while 41.3% used it to communicate with colleagues about patients and patient referrals. 34.0% found e-mail useful for ordering goods, and supplies and 14.6% were using electronic mail to make patient appointments at least some of the time. CONCLUSIONS: Responses can be obtained at much greater speed than conventional postal techniques will allow, but response rates were only 53.4%. E-mail is predominately used at home and for inter-professional communications, only a small proportion of responders use it for direct communication with patients.

Appointments and Schedules