PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9520383

How Cro and lambda-repressor distinguish between operators: the structural basis underlying a genetic switch.

Abstract

Knowledge of the three-dimensional structures of the lambda-Cro and lambda-repressor proteins in complex with DNA has made it possible to evaluate how these proteins discriminate between different operators in phage lambda. As anticipated in previous studies, the helix-turn-helix units of the respective proteins bind in very different alignments. In Cro the recognition helices are 29 A apart and are tilted by 55 degrees with respect to each other, but bind parallel to the major groove of the DNA. In lambda-repressor [Beamer, L. J. & Pabo, C. O. (1992) J. Mol. Biol. 227, 177-196] the helices are 34 A apart and are essentially parallel to each other, but are inclined to the major grooves. The DNA is much more bent when bound by Cro than in the case with lambda-repressor. The first two amino acids of the recognition helices of the two proteins, Gln-27 and Ser-28 in Cro, and Gln-44 and Ser-45 in lambda-repressor, make very similar interactions with the invariant bps 2 and 4. There are also analogous contacts between the thymine of bp 5 and, respectively, the backbone of Ala-29 of Cro and the backbone of Gly-46 of lambda-repressor. Otherwise, however, unrelated parts of the two proteins are used in sequence-specific recognition. It appears that similar contacts to the invariant or almost invariant bps (especially 2 and 4) are used by both Cro and lambda-repressor to differentiate the operator sites as a group from other sites on the DNA. The discrimination of Cro and lambda-repressor between their different operators is more subtle and seems to be achieved primarily through differences in van der Waals contacts at bp 3', together with weaker, less direct effects at bps 5' and 8', all in the nonconsensus half of the operators. The results provide further support for the idea that there is no simple code for DNA-protein recognition.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R A Albright, B W Matthews. 1998-03-31. How Cro and lambda-repressor distinguish between operators: the structural basis underlying a genetic switch.. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.7.3431

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Genetic footprinting in bacteria.

In vivo genetic footprinting was developed in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae to simultaneously assess the importance of thousands of genes for the fitness of the cell under any growth condition. We have developed in vivo genetic footprinting for Escherichia coli, a model bacterium and pathogen. We further demonstrate the utility of this technology for rapidly discovering genes that affect the fitness of E. coli under a variety of growth conditions. The definitive features of this system include a conditionally regulated Tn10 transposase with relaxed sequence specificity and a conditionally regulated replicon for the vector containing the transposase and mini-Tn10 transposon with an outwardly oriented promoter. This system results in a high frequency of randomly distributed transposon insertions, eliminating the need for the selection of a population containing transposon insertions, stringent suppression of transposon mutagenesis, and few polar effects. Successful footprints have been achieved for most genes longer than 400 bp, including genes located in operons. In addition, the ability of recombinant proteins to complement mutagenized hosts has been evaluated by genetic footprinting using a bacteriophage lambda transposon delivery system.

Bacteriophage lambda↗

Structure of the bacteriophage lambda Ser/Thr protein phosphatase with sulfate ion bound in two coordination modes.

The protein phosphatase encoded by bacteriophage lambda (lambda PP) belongs to a family of Ser/Thr phosphatases (Ser/Thr PPases) that includes the eukaryotic protein phosphatases 1 (PP1), 2A (PP2A), and 2B (calcineurin). These Ser/Thr PPases and the related purple acid phosphatases (PAPs) contain a conserved phosphoesterase sequence motif that binds a dinuclear metal center. The mechanisms of phosphoester hydrolysis by these enzymes are beginning to be unraveled. To utilize lambda PP more effectively as a model for probing the catalytic mechanism of the Ser/Thr PPases, we have determined its crystal structure to 2.15 A resolution. The overall fold resembles that of PP1 and calcineurin, including a conserved beta alpha beta alpha beta structure that comprises the phosphoesterase motif. Substrates and inhibitors probably bind in a narrow surface groove that houses the active site dinuclear Mn(II) center. The arrangement of metal ligands is similar to that in PP1, calcineurin, and PAP, and a bound sulfate ion is present in two novel coordination modes. In two of the three molecules in the crystallographic asymmetric unit, sulfate is coordinated to Mn2 in a monodentate, terminal fashion, and the two Mn(II) ions are bridged by a solvent molecule. Two additional solvent molecules are coordinated to Mn1. In the third molecule, the sulfate ion is triply coordinated to the metal center with one oxygen coordinated to both Mn(II) ions, one oxygen coordinated to Mn1, and one oxygen coordinated to Mn2. The sulfate in this coordination mode displaces the bridging ligand and one of the terminal solvent ligands. In both sulfate coordination modes, the sulfate ion is stabilized by hydrogen bonding interactions with conserved arginine residues, Arg 53 and Arg 162. The two different active site structures provide models for intermediates in phosphoester hydrolysis and suggest specific mechanistic roles for conserved residues.

Bacteriophage lambda↗

DNA condensation in two dimensions.

We have found that divalent electrolyte counterions common in biological cells (Ca(2+), Mg(2+), and Mn(2+) ) can condense anionic DNA molecules confined to two-dimensional cationic surfaces. DNA-condensing agents in vivo include cationic histones and polyamines spermidine and spermine with sufficiently high valence (Z) 3 or larger. In vitro studies show that electrostatic forces between DNA chains in bulk aqueous solution containing divalent counterions remain purely repulsive, and DNA condensation requires counterion valence Z >/= 3. In striking contrast to bulk behavior, synchrotron x-ray diffraction and optical absorption experiments show that above a critical divalent counterion concentration the electrostatic forces between DNA chains adsorbed on surfaces of cationic membranes reverse from repulsive to attractive and lead to a chain collapse transition into a condensed phase of DNA tethered by divalent counterions. This demonstrates the importance of spatial dimensionality to intermolecular interactions where nonspecific counterion-induced electrostatic attractions between the like-charged polyelectrolytes overwhelm the electrostatic repulsions on a surface for Z = 2. This new phase, with a one-dimensional counterion liquid trapped between DNA chains at a density of 0.63 counterions per DNA bp, represents the most compact state of DNA on a surface in vitro and suggests applications in high-density storage of genetic information and organo-metallic materials processing.

Bacteriophage lambda↗