PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 9526317

Implementing lessons we learned as children.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M J Hill. 1998. Implementing lessons we learned as children.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9526317/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Somatization reconsidered: incorporating the patient's experience of illness.

The large and heterogeneous group of patients with "unexplained somatic symptoms," with or without coexisting psychiatric, "functional," or "organic" illnesses, provides continuing difficulty for clinicians. The construct of somatization artificially separates bodily and psychological symptoms that patients experience as a unified whole. Concurrent chronic illnesses make it difficult to exclude "general medical conditions." The diagnosis requires that the patient seek medical care. Conflict between patients' experiences of illness and physicians' diagnostic categories, and fear of blaming the patient, complicate naming and characterizing the illness. We recommend an approach to clinical care that involves exploring the patient's life context, finding mutually meaningful language to arrive at a name for the illness, normalizing the patient's bodily experience of distress, using a chronic disease model that attends to functioning, and addressing the physician's need for certainty and efficacy. Health systems can help coordinate care and avoid iatrogenic harm by appropriately controlling access to medical services.

Communication

The uses of error.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Communication

Soliciting the patient's agenda: have we improved?

CONTEXT: Previous research indicates physicians frequently choose a patient problem to explore before determining the patient's full spectrum of concerns. OBJECTIVE: To examine the extent to which experienced family physicians in various practice settings elicit the agenda of concerns patients bring to the office. DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey using linguistic analysis of a convenience sample of 264 patient-physician interviews. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Primary care offices of 29 board-certified family physicians practicing in rural Washington (n = 1; 3%), semirural Colorado (n = 20; 69%), and urban settings in the United States and Canada (n = 8; 27%). Nine participants had fellowship training in communication skills and family counseling. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient-physician verbal interactions, including physician solicitations of patient concerns, rate of completion of patient responses, length of time for patient responses, and frequency of late-arising patient concerns. RESULTS: Physicians solicited patient concerns in 199 interviews (75.4%). Patients' initial statements of concerns were completed in 74 interviews (28.0%). Physicians redirected the patient's opening statement after a mean of 23.1 seconds. Patients allowed to complete their statement of concerns used only 6 seconds more on average than those who were redirected before completion of concerns. Late-arising concerns were more common when physicians did not solicit patient concerns during the interview (34.9% vs 14.9%). Fellowship-trained physicians were more likely to solicit patient concerns and allow patients to complete their initial statement of concerns (44% vs 22%). CONCLUSIONS: Physicians often redirect patients' initial descriptions of their concerns. Once redirected, the descriptions are rarely completed. Consequences of incomplete initial descriptions include late-arising concerns and missed opportunities to gather potentially important patient data. Soliciting the patient's agenda takes little time and can improve interview efficiency and yield increased data.

Communication