PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 9529470

Clinical teaching rounds. A case-oriented faculty development program.

P S Lye·D E Simpson·K J Wendelberger·D S Bragg
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To improve clinical teaching with emphasis on improving provision of feedback through a faculty development series modeled on clinical rounds. METHOD: Seven 1-hour conferences were held for the pediatric faculty during the academic year 1994-1995. Clinical rounds were emulated, with a simulated learner functioning as the patient with a chief complaint of some instructional problem. The conferences progressed from discussion about teaching in a particular situation, to videotapes of clinical teaching, and finally to live clinical teaching. Evaluation of the conferences was assessed by attendance records, participants' evaluations of the conferences, and comparing student and resident evaluations of faculty who attended (i.e., those who attended > or = 2) with faculty who did not attend. Comparisons were made for the academic year before and after the conferences using paired t tests. RESULTS: Forty percent of the faculty attended 2 or more conferences. Mean conference ratings were 4.00 to 4.35, (1 is poor; 5, excellent). Faculty who attended had a significant improvement in ratings for feedback (P = .01) and overall teaching effectiveness (P = .04). Ratings for faculty who did not attend did not change. CONCLUSION: These conferences were well received by the faculty and are an effective way to improve clinical teaching.

Explore related subjects

Clinical CompetenceFaculty, MedicalFeedbackHumansPediatricsStaff DevelopmentTeachingJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P S Lye, D E Simpson, K J Wendelberger, D S Bragg. 1998. Clinical teaching rounds. A case-oriented faculty development program.. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.152.3.293

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1999

A qualitative analysis of how physicians with expertise in domestic violence approach the identification of victims.

BACKGROUND: Physicians have been called upon to identify victims of domestic violence, but few studies provide insight into how physicians can navigate around the barriers to identification. OBJECTIVE: To describe how physicians who are committed to helping battered patients identify victims of domestic violence in health care encounters. DESIGN: Six focus groups were conducted. SETTING: Focus group research facilities. PARTICIPANTS: 45 emergency department, obstetrician/ gynecologist, and primary care physicians in the San Francisco Bay Area who identify and intervene with victims of domestic violence. MEASUREMENTS: Through constant comparison, a template of open codes was constructed to identify themes that emerged from the data. Data were analyzed according to the conventions of qualitative research. RESULTS: The data revealed five major themes: 1) how physicians framed screening questions to reduce patient discomfort; 2) patient signs that "switched on a light bulb" for physicians to suspect abuse; 3) direct and indirect approaches to identification, with an emphasis on facilitating patient trust and disclosure over time; 4) the rarity of direct patient disclosure; and 5) how physicians redefined successful outcomes of universal screening. Physicians also described two new barriers to screening: mandatory reporting and "burnout" due to lack of direct disclosure. CONCLUSIONS: Identifying domestic abuse is difficult even for physicians committed to helping victims. Physician reports illustrate the need to frame questions and develop indirect approaches that foster patient trust. Given the many barriers to screening and the rarity of direct patient disclosure, it may be more productive to redefine the goals of universal screening so that compassionate asking in and of itself constitutes the first step in helping battered patients.

Clinical Competence↗