PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9541337

Maximizing clozapine therapy: managing side effects.

Abstract

Since its introduction to the United States in 1990, the benefits of clozapine use have been repeatedly validated. Clozapine remains the only antipsychotic with proven efficacy in treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Because clozapine has been part of the psychiatric pharmacopeia for considerably less time than neuroleptics, which have dominated the field for over 4 decades, its underutilization may be partly attributed to a lack of experience in managing associated side effects. Most side effects associated with clozapine are typical of antipsychotics in general, and with clozapine, these side effects are typically benign, tolerable, and manageable. It is conceivable that there remains a concern over the risk of agranulocytosis. However, the mandatory blood monitoring carried out through the Clozaril National Registry has considerably reduced the incidence of fully developed cases of agranulocytosis from premarketing values of approximately 1% to 2% to current values of 0.38% and virtually prevented mortalities. These values are likely to decrease further with the application of cytokine augmentation therapy among patients developing blood dyscrasias. Many side effects of clozapine are observed early after treatment onset and are greatly reduced by dose adjustments. Appropriate management of side effects will facilitate a maximization of the benefits of clozapine treatment. Clearly, the benefits of clozapine therapy far outweigh its risks.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J A Lieberman. 1998. Maximizing clozapine therapy: managing side effects.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9541337/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Restarting clozapine after neutropenia: evaluating the possibilities and practicalities.

Clozapine remains the antipsychotic of choice for refractory schizophrenia despite its propensity for serious blood disorders. When neutropenia or agranulocytosis occur in people taking clozapine, cessation of treatment is mandated and relapse often results. Because such patients are usually unresponsive to other antipsychotics, many clinicians consider restarting clozapine, despite the risks involved. However, the risks of clozapine rechallenge vary according to the cause and nature of the blood dyscrasia. Neutropenia can arise because of factors unrelated or indirectly related to clozapine treatment. These include benign ethnic neutropenia, concomitant drug therapy, co-existing medical conditions and drug interactions. In such cases, clozapine may be restarted if non-clozapine causes of neutropenia are identified and eliminated, although concurrent treatment with lithium (to induce leukocytosis) is sometimes necessary. Close monitoring of the patient is essential because it is rarely possible to completely rule out the contribution of clozapine to the blood dyscrasia and because lithium does not protect against clozapine-related agranulocytosis. In cases of clozapine-induced neutropenia (as distinct from agranulocytosis, which may have a different pathology) rechallenge may also be considered and, again, lithium co-therapy may be required. Where clozapine is clearly the cause of agranulocytosis, rechallenge should not be considered or undertaken unless there are very exceptional circumstances (severe and prolonged relapse following clozapine discontinuation). In these cases, re-exposure to clozapine may rarely be attempted where there are facilities for very close and frequent monitoring. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor is likely to be required as co-therapy, given the very high likelihood of recurrence. Uncertainty over the likely cause of blood dyscrasia in people taking clozapine, coupled with uncertainty over the mechanism by which clozapine causes both neutropenia and agranulocytosis, makes any attempt to restart clozapine a high-risk venture requiring the utmost caution.

Agranulocytosis↗

Increased susceptibility to bacterial superinfection as a consequence of innate antiviral responses.

The reason why severe localized or systemic virus infections enhance and aggravate bacterial superinfection is poorly understood. Here we show that virus-induced IFN type I caused apoptosis in bone marrow granulocytes, drastically reduced granulocyte infiltrates at the site of bacterial superinfection, caused up to 1,000-fold higher bacterial titers in solid organs, and increased disease susceptibility. The finding that the innate antiviral immune response reduces the antibacterial granulocyte defense offers an explanation for enhanced susceptibility to bacterial superinfection during viral disease.

Agranulocytosis↗