PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9549678

Xenografting: ethical issues.

Abstract

This paper considers the ethical issues raised by xenotransplantation under four headings: interfering with nature; effects on the recipient; effects on other humans; and effects on donor animals. The first two issues raise no insuperable problems: charges of unnaturalness are misguided, and the risks that xenotransplantation carries for the recipient are a matter for properly informed consent. The other two issues raise more serious problems, however, and it is argued that if we take seriously the risk of transferring new infectious agents from animal to human populations and the interests of donor animals, then a moratorium on xenotransplantation is called for. The paper finds that the recent Nuffield Council and Department of Health reports on xenotransplantation are insufficiently cautious in the conclusions that they draw from these considerations.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Hughes. 1998. Xenografting: ethical issues.. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.24.1.18

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Field studies and the IACUC: protocol review, oversight, and occupational health and safety considerations.

Field studies involving animals, like other institutional research endeavors, are regulated and evaluated by an IACUC to insure that the protocols employed in those studies are consistent with the most humane care and use of animals. Unlike many other on-site research projects, however, field studies present unique logistical and other challenges to IACUC evaluation. The authors explore many of these challenges, including the special protocol considerations and idiosyncratic occupational health and safety concerns characteristic of field-study reviews.

Animal Experimentation↗