PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 9549838

Normal fetal thyroid volume.

S S Ho·C Metreweli
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A prospective study of 289 normal fetal thyroids was undertaken between 20 and 36 weeks of gestation in 289 mothers without any history of thyroid disease or maternal disease that could cause intrauterine growth restriction. The fetal thyroid volume was calculated by the ellipsoid equation, with the assumption that each lobe was an ellipse. A nomogram relating fetal thyroid volume to gestational age was established. The mean fetal thyroid volume was found to be 0.23 +/- 0.18 cm3 (median 0.17 cm3; range 0.022-0.85 cm3). The ratio of fetal thyroid volume to estimated fetal weight (V/W ratio) (at 0.163 +/- 0.079 cm3/kg) was constant throughout gestation. The value was smaller than those of the child and the adult reported in other studies, indicating that fetal thyroid enlargement is likely to be underestimated if based on postnatal criteria. It was found that the mean fetal thyroid volume was significantly correlated with estimated fetal weight and gestational age, in which the former dominated the effect. The fetal thyroid increased in size much faster after 32 weeks, suggesting that evaluation of possible fetal goiter should take into account gestational age and the nomogram developed in this study.

Explore related subjects

Body WeightFetusGestational AgeHumansPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesReference ValuesThyroid GlandUltrasonography, PrenatalJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S S Ho, C Metreweli. 1998. Normal fetal thyroid volume.. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0705.1998.11020118.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2000

Mood and energy regulation in seasonal and non-seasonal depression before and after midday treatment with physical exercise or bright light.

The effects of two non-drug treatments (physical exercise and bright light) on mood, body weight and oxygen consumption were compared in age-matched groups of female subjects with winter depression, non-seasonal depression or without depression. It was found that oxygen consumption in the pre-treatment condition was similar in non-depressed subjects (n=18) and depressed non-seasonals (n=18), while comparatively lower values were obtained in winter depression (n=27). Neither mood nor metabolic parameters changed significantly in the group of nine untreated winter depressives. One week of physical exercise (1-h pedaling on a bicycle ergometer between 13.00 and 14.00 h) increased oxygen consumption in the group of nine winter depressives and lowered oxygen consumption in nine-subject groups of depressed and non-depressed non-seasonals. One week of bright light treatment (2-h exposure to 2500 lux between 14.00 and 16.00 h) increased oxygen consumption in nine winter depressives and nine non-depressed subjects, while no significant change in oxygen consumption was found in nine subjects with non-seasonal depression. Weight loss was observed in the groups treated with physical exercise and in the group of light-treated winter depressives. Winter depression responded equally well to exercising and light, while a significant therapeutic difference in favor of exercising was found in non-seasonal depression. Overall, the results of the study suggest that energy-regulating systems are implicated in the antidepressant action of the non-drug treatments.

Body Weight↗
PubMed2000

Body weight and low back pain. A systematic literature review of 56 journal articles reporting on 65 epidemiologic studies.

STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review of the epidemiologic literature. OBJECTIVE: To establish if body weight is truly associated with low back pain (LBP) and whether the link may be causal. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Because obesity and LBP are prevalent in western society, it is of interest to establish whether obesity can induce LBP. METHODS: Fifty-six original research reports, reporting on 65 studies published between 1965 and 1997, were systematically reviewed for the frequency of positive associations between body weight and LBP. In addition, the presence of positive findings was examined in relation to several study characteristics. Based on these results, only studies emanating from the general population with a sample size exceeding 3000 were included in the additional search for causality using some of the classical Bradford-Hill criteria. The review was carried out by the author, blindly at 2 months' interval. RESULTS: Thirty-two percent of all the studies report a statistically significant positive weak association between body weight and LBP. Studies that fulfilled the post hoc criteria never report a rate ratio above 2, but there is possibly a positive biological gradient. These studies had no information on temporality or reversibility and there was no obvious consistency of findings. CONCLUSIONS: Due to lack of evidence, body weight should be considered a possible weak risk indicator, but there is insufficient data to assess if it is a true cause of LBP.

Body Weight↗