PubMed · 9559504
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
L B Nelson, R S Wagner. Managing orbital cellulitis.. https://doi.org/10.3928/0191-3913-19980301-03
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Family physicians frequently treat bacterial skin infections in the office and in the hospital. Common skin infections include cellulitis, erysipelas, impetigo, folliculitis, and furuncles and carbuncles. Cellulitis is an infection of the dermis and subcutaneous tissue that has poorly demarcated borders and is usually caused by Streptococcus or Staphylococcus species. Erysipelas is a superficial form of cellulitis with sharply demarcated borders and is caused almost exclusively by Streptococcus. Impetigo is also caused by Streptococcus or Staphylococcus and can lead to lifting of the stratum corneum resulting in the commonly seen bullous effect. Folliculitis is an inflammation of the hair follicles. When the infection is bacterial rather than mechanical in nature, it is most commonly caused by Staphylococcus. If the infection of the follicle is deeper and involves more follicles, it moves into the furuncle and carbuncle stages and usually requires incision and drainage. All of these infections are typically diagnosed by clinical presentation and treated empirically. If antibiotics are required, one that is active against gram-positive organisms such as penicillinase-resistant penicillins, cephalosporins, macrolides, or fluoroquinolones should be chosen. Children, patients who have diabetes, or patients who have immunodeficiencies are more susceptible to gram-negative infections and may require treatment with a second- or third-generation cephalosporin.
BACKGROUND: In order to combine the advantages of a minimal invasive approach with a retromuscular mesh implantation, we developed an endoscopic totally preperitoneal approach for the treatment of ventral hernias. METHODS: The surgical technique is described with the accent on preoperative marking of mesh surface, the retromuscular insertion of the first trocar, the extraperitoneal dissection, the reduction of the hernia sac, and the choice and insertion of the mesh. RESULTS: Fifteen patients have been operated. Complete reduction of the hernia sac could be accomplished in five. In eight, the peritoneum was incised at the hernia neck. A polypropylene mesh was used in six cases. In the others, ePTFE or a composite mesh was used. Circumferential fixation with a tacker was performed. No major complications were seen. No mesh needed to be removed. One recurrence was seen 5.5 months postoperatively with a median follow-up period of 126 days. CONCLUSIONS: This new endoscopic technique takes advantage of immediate mesh fixation by the peritoneal sac and may avoid the potential complications related to the transabdominal approach and intraabdominal position of the mesh. A further long-term evaluation is necessary.