PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 9563446

Laparoscopic biliary injury: more than a learning curve problem.

J A Windsor·J Pong
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The increase in the incidence of iatrogenic injury to the extrahepatic biliary tree that has been documented since the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has been explained as a 'learning curve' problem. The early New Zealand experience has been published and the present study was undertaken to determine whether there had been any change in the incidence, nature and management of laparoscopic biliary injuries (LBI) after further experience with LC. METHODS: A nationwide audit was undertaken in 1995 by two confidential postal questionnaires: to all active general surgeons (n=184, response rate 60%), and to all endoscopists performing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) (n=18, response rate 100%). RESULTS: The total number of LBI was 21, compared with 41 for 1991-92. The site and nature of the injuries were similar for the two survey periods. More of the injuries appeared to be diagnosed after the operation and prior to discharge (25% vs 47%). Calculating the national incidence of LBI was not possible without complete reporting, but in the subset of surgeons responsible for the LBI there was no apparent decrease in the incidence of all LBI (2.8% vs 2.9%), those requiring active re-intervention (2.4% vs 2.7%) and major duct injury (1.1% vs 0.7%), despite a significant increase in the surgeons' prior experience with LC (20% vs 61% of surgeons had performed more than 100 LC). There were some concerning trends in management: a less frequent use of ERCP in patients with LBI diagnosed after surgery (76% vs 65%) and a higher proportion of patients with minor injuries managed by re-operation (26% vs 50%). CONCLUSIONS: The present study indicates that iatrogenic biliary injury is a persistent problem in New Zealand, despite increasing experience with LC, and suggests the need for more intensive scrutiny of operative technique and training. There is scope to manage more patients with minor duct injuries conservatively.

Explore related subjects

Bile Ducts, ExtrahepaticCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeCholecystectomy, LaparoscopicCommon Bile DuctCystic DuctHumansIatrogenic DiseaseIncidenceIntraoperative ComplicationsMedical AuditNew ZealandSurveys and QuestionnairesWounds and InjuriesJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J A Windsor, J Pong. 1998. Laparoscopic biliary injury: more than a learning curve problem.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.1998.tb04742.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Preoperative evaluation of the extrahepatic bile duct structure for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of aberrant bile duct injury associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has not yet been adequately examined. This study aimed to clarify the types of normal cystic ducts and the incidence of aberrant extrahepatic bile ducts, and to search for a method of avoiding injuries during LC. METHODS: Aberrant hepatic ducts were retrospectively categorized into five types according to the pattern of the cystic ducts and the accessory hepatic ducts by preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography or multidetector three-dimensional computed tomography using drip infusion cholangiography. The aberrant bile ducts were classified as type A (merging at the right side of the common bile duct), type B (merging at the anterior side), or type C (merging at the posterior left side). RESULTS: The intrahepatic bile ducts and cystic duct were clearly shown for 1,044 of the 1,278 patients who underwent LC. Secondary branches of aberrant cystic ducts were observed in 37 cases (3.5%), and accessory hepatic ducts were observed in 30 cases (2.9%). A comparison of the difficulties encountered with LC for each type based on the merging patterns of cystic ducts showed that type C needed a much longer operation time for LC than the other types. CONCLUSIONS: A preoperative evaluation of the bile duct tract and the accessory hepatic duct before LC is important. Patients with a cystic duct merging normally into the posterior left side of the common hepatic duct (type C) experienced difficulty when undergoing LC. The authors have safely performed LC with the use of an endoscopic nasobiliary drainage tube in type D cases (cystic duct merging with the right hepatic duct), in type IV cases (cystic duct merging with an accessory hepatic duct).

Bile Ducts, Extrahepatic↗
PubMed2006

Operative approach to gallbladder cancer.

In most Western countries gallbladder cancer is a rare tumor with a poor prognosis. The majority of patients present with advanced-stage tumors (stage IV) that are not amenable to surgical resection. At the other end of the spectrum a small percentage of patients present with stage I disease that may be cured by cholecystectomy. The role for surgery in patients with stage II and III disease remains controversial, but most hepatobiliary surgeons believe that an aggressive surgical approach improves survival for these patients. However, the extent of hepatic and lymph node resection, the need for resection of the extrahepatic ducts in nonjaundiced patients, the role of vascular resection, and the advisability of hepatopancreatoduodenectomy remain a matter of debate. Although no data from prospective, randomized studies are available, resection of the gallbladder and adjacent liver with or without the extrahepatic bile ducts and with a regional lymph node dissection is the operative approach recommended for selected patients with gallbladder cancer.

Bile Ducts, Extrahepatic↗