PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 9573974

Improving your bedside manner.

R Davidhizar·R Shearer
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Positive bedside manners are essential when caring for patients. Positive bedside manners should be utilized wherever patients and their significant others are encountered. Putting your best foot forward is the first step in establishing a therapeutic relationship. Attention to one's professional image is important if the client is to see the licensed practical/vocational nurse as someone that can be trusted. Next is actively communicating interest and concern. It is also important to communicate empathy and respect through words and actions. The LP/VN must practice attending skills in order for the patient to experience the physical and psychological presence of the nurse. Communicating availability and following up on requests promote the establishment of trust. It is important for the nurse to avoid defensiveness, maintain a professional manner, answer questions honestly, demonstrate integrity, maintain a positive attitude and practice intentional encouragement. All the characteristics will demonstrate a positive bedside manner and will communicate caring and concern to clients and their significant others.

Explore related subjects

Attitude of Health PersonnelClinical CompetenceCommunicationEmpathyHumansNurse-Patient RelationsNursing, PracticalJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R Davidhizar, R Shearer. 1998. Improving your bedside manner.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9573974/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2001

Practice guidelines: useful and "participative" method? Survey of Italian physicians by professional setting.

BACKGROUND: Professional setting might be a key determinant of physicians' attitudes toward practice guidelines, influencing the effect of their implementation. Because no previous surveys have specifically considered this aspect, we evaluated the perceived role and usefulness of guidelines, as well as barriers to and facilitators of their implementation, for hospital, primary care, and nonpracticing clinicians. METHODS: A 43-item self-administered questionnaire was sent to all National Health Service physicians in the province of Modena, Italy (593 primary care physicians, 1049 hospital physicians, and 149 nonpracticing clinicians), and 1199 (66.9%) responded. Opinions and attitudes were assessed using 5-point ordinal scales and an attitude measurement scale. Results were evaluated overall and by professional setting, sex, age, year of graduation, and academic background. RESULTS: Practice guidelines were generally perceived to be less useful than other sources of medical information (eg, personal experience, conferences, colleagues, articles, the Internet, and textbooks [pharmaceutical representatives were the exception]). Most physicians thought that guidelines are developed for cost-containment reasons and expressed concerns about their limited applicability to individual patients and local settings. Most respondents did not favor the involvement of health professionals other than physicians in guideline development and use and preferred nonmonetary incentives for their implementation. Answers to individual items and attitude scores varied significantly across professional settings. Primary care physicians showed, in general, the least favorable attitudes toward practice guidelines, toward nonphysicians participating in guideline development and use, and toward incentives for guideline users. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians perceived practice guidelines as externally imposed and cost-containment tools rather than as decision-supporting tools. Regularly monitoring attitudes toward practice guidelines can be helpful to evaluate potential barriers to their adoption.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed2001

Attitudes to menopause and hormone replacement therapy among Asian and Caucasian women general practitioners.

OBJECTIVE: To look for any differences in attitudes to menopause and hormone replacement therapy (HRT) between Asian and Caucasian women standardised for educational background, socio-economic status and access to medical information. METHOD: Self administered postal questionnaire sent to 144 women doctors (general practitioners) in defined geographical areas. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 61%. Both Asian and Caucasian women responded in a similar manner for most aspects. A high proportion of these women doctors (over 75%) would seek HRT at the climacteric. More Asian respondents reported a fear of breast cancer (P=0.001), and that a woman feels less of a woman after the menopause (P=0.02). More Caucasian respondents felt positively about the potential for HRT to enhance enjoyment of life (P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The lack of major differences between the ethnic groups in our sample suggests that variations reported elsewhere may be due to lack of knowledge and/or differences in socio-economic status.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗