PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 9577879

[Dendritic cells: a complex cellular system].

J C Gluckman·B Canque·M Rosenzwajg
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Dendritic cells (DC) are the most potent antigen-presenting cells. Thus, ex vivo antigen-pulsed DC are a potentially powerful tool to induce in vivo immunity against tumor-associated or viral antigens. Therefore, culture methods to generate high numbers of DC from bone marrow or blood CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells have recently been developed. These methods, which use different combinations of growth factor--mainly granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha and interleukin (IL)-4--make the characterization of DC obtained from CD34+ cells of different origins easier and allow to assess whether DC relate to a unique or distinct differentiation pathways. Monocytes and even macrophages can also directly differentiate into DC in the presence of GM-CSF and IL-4. This has to be reconciled with evidence supporting earlier branching off of the macrophage and DC lineages, and raises questions as to the identity of the latter lineage. Apart from DC of myeloid origin, DC may also originate from lymphoid progenitors. Because the capacity of DC to capture, process and present antigens is known to vary according to their differentiation stage, and lymphoid DC might behave differently from lymphoid DC in this respect, the definition of which type of DC to use for immunotherapy must be more precise, in order to avoid detrimental side effects or results. From a practical point of view, it is also necessary to define the most appropriate cytokine combinations and schedules thereof to optimize proliferation and differentiation of DC from different origins. These conditions should then be applied to generated DC for their efficient and safe use for clinical immunotherapy.

Explore related subjects

Cell Culture TechniquesCell DifferentiationCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyDendritic CellsHematopoietic Stem CellsHumansLymphocytesMonocytesEnglish AbstractJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J C Gluckman, B Canque, M Rosenzwajg. 1998. [Dendritic cells: a complex cellular system].. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1246-7820(98)80110-9

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2003

Comparison of different culture media and storage temperatures for the long-term preservation of Streptococcus pneumoniae in the tropics.

OBJECTIVE: The preservation of Streptococcus pneumoniae by standard freezing methods for subsequent tests--such as serotyping and antibiotic susceptibility--is not possible or is difficult in many developing countries because of the high cost of equipment, inadequate equipment maintenance, and irregular power supply. We evaluated alternative low-cost methods, by comparing different culture media and storage temperatures. METHODS: Clinical isolates of five capsular types (1, 5, 7, 19, and 23) of S. pneumoniae were preserved in rabbit blood, sheep blood, skimmed milk, or glycerol-chocolate broth, and stored at -20 degrees C or -70 degrees C. The cultures were also preserved by lyophilization or sand desiccation, followed by storage at room temperature and 4 degrees C. The viability of the preserved cultures was determined by making serial colony counts on day 0 and after 1 week, 4 weeks, 4 months and 16 months. The viability of cultures preserved by sand desiccation and storage at 4 degrees C was also determined every 6 months for up to 68 months. FINDINGS: Irrespective of the media used, cultures maintained at -20 degrees C became nonviable by the fourth month, while those maintained at -70 degrees C were still viable at 16 months. Cultures preserved by lyophilization or sand desiccation lost their viability by the fourth month when maintained at local room temperature (30-42 degrees C), but remained viable when stored at 4 degrees C for up to 68 months. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that freezing at -70 degrees C, or lyophilization and storage at 4 degrees C are the ideal methods for the preservation of S. pneumoniae. In laboratories where lyophilization is not feasible, sand desiccation and storage at 4 degrees C offers an alternative low-cost method for the long-term preservation of S. pneumoniae.

Cell Culture Techniques↗
PubMed2001

VEGF is upregulated in a neuroblastoma and hepatocyte coculture model.

BACKGROUND: We hypothesize that angiogenic factors are altered by the interaction between neuroblastoma cells and host tissues. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Human Chang hepatocytes and human neuroblastoma cells are cultured separately and in a noncontact, coculture system. Immunostaining for VEGF is performed on the cells. ELISA is used to detect vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), basic fibroblast growth factor, and interleukin-8 in the conditioned media. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) are cultured with standard medium (control) and hepatocyte, neuroblastoma, and coculture conditioned media. After 48 and 72 h, cells are counted to determine proliferation. Finally, VEGF-blocking antibody is added to the HUVEC cultures with the conditioned media. RESULTS: VEGF is markedly elevated in the coculture medium compared to the media from hepatocytes or neuroblastoma grown alone [412.2 +/- 52 vs 235 +/- 35 or 74.5 +/- 28.5 (pg/10(6) cells), P < 0.05]. Other growth factors are almost undetectable in any of the media. Immunostaining for VEGF in the cocultured hepatocytes is decreased by almost 50%, but VEGF immunostaining is increased fourfold in the cocultured neuroblastoma cells. A significant increase in cell proliferation is seen at both 48 and 72 h when HUVEC are cultured with the coculture media. Cell proliferation is blocked with the addition of anti-VEGF antibody. CONCLUSION: The interaction of neuroblastoma with hepatocytes results in an increased production of VEGF. It stimulates endothelial cell proliferation and may enhance the tumor's metastatic potential in an autocrine fashion.

Cell Culture Techniques↗