PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9592499

A neonatal care map based on gestational age.

Abstract

Care maps have been used successfully in the adult population. To evaluate the use of these patient care models in the neonatal population, one Level III NICU compared data on 146 infants who ranged in gestational age from 24 to 33 weeks. Nine clinical benchmarks were identified as serving to define the infant's progress. These nine benchmarks were back to birth weight, extubation, discontinuation of hyperalimentation, discontinuation of NCPAP, feeding trial via orogastric tube, weaned to open crib, discontinuation of oxygen, full oral feedings, and discharge home. Gestational age was consistently observed to be the dominant determinant of the infant's readiness to achieve these physiologic tasks. The result of this project is a neonatal care map, based on gestational age. This care map outlines the expected treatment and response of the neonatal patient. It serves as a guide for both clinicians and families.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C R Tobin, E Sabatte, A S Sandhu, E Penafiel. 1998. A neonatal care map based on gestational age.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9592499/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Clinical management. Design for living.

91 per cent of patients started treatment within two mounths of referral, compared to 70-80 per cent last year. The last five months has seen rapid progress at a rate of 2 per cent a month. Sustaining improvement depends on leadership, measurement and looking at the whole patient pathway.

Critical Pathways↗

[Clinical pathways -- first results of a systematic IT-supported application at a surgical department of a university hospital].

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In analogy to industrial process management, clinical pathways have been introduced for operational process organisation in orthopedic and interventional procedures as well as for conservative treatments. Within this study, introduction and continuous, systematic application of clinical pathways at a surgical department of a university hospital was investigated. METHODS: Analysis was performed by IT-based (SAP/i. s. h.med) evaluation of the registered data regarding pathway violations. Additionally, patients' records were matched with the computerized data for quality assurance of pathway documentation. RESULTS: 501 patients were entered in 16 clinical pathways (31 +/- 39 patients per pathway). The mean period from the introduction of a distinct pathway to the data acquisition of the present study ranged from 2 to 14 months (mean 7+/-7.5 months). Pathway violations correlated with the complexity, but not with the period since the pathway was introduced. Organisational reasons next to medical reasons (i. e. delayed gastric function or wound healing) were the most frequent causes for pathway violations. CONCLUSION: Clinical pathways may not only be realised for operative procedures or conservative treatments, but represent a clinical and administrative management instrument at a surgical department of a university hospital for daily work routine. They are suitable as an instrument for clinical quality and risk management, as an economic control instrument in reorganisation phases as well as in the routine of surgical clinics.

Critical Pathways↗