PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9596378

Syringe exchange in Germany.

Abstract

Syringe exchange in Germany is clearly linked to a recent shift of local responses to drug-use(r) associated problem. Since the end of the 1980s, metropolitan communities in Northern and Central Germany-concerned by the emergence of "Open Drug Scenes," increasing HIV and mortality rates among drug users, and drug-use-related property crime-began to favor measures of survival-oriented drug-user help. While the Federal Government still favors repression and law enforcement efforts, they nevertheless made syringe exchange explicitly legal in 1992-some 5 years after the creation of local Syringe Exchange Programs. In general, the new approach of local authorities includes a variety of services, such as housing facilities, crisis intervention centers, primary medical care, maintenance with substitute drugs, and syringe exchange programs. The creation of pilot heroin maintenance programs is planned for Frankfurt and Hamburg. While the established programs are successfully functioning in large cities such as Hamburg, Bremen, and Frankfurt, the demand for sterile needles and syringes remains unmet in smaller cities and in the conservative governed Bundeslander (states), where pharmacies remain the primary and often single legal supply source for syringes. Another major problem continues to be the drug-use situation in prisons. Although injection drug use is common in prisons, injection equipment is not legally available for the 10,000 injecting drug users imprisoned at any given time. Two of Germany's 220 prisons started an experimental syringe exchange in 1996.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

U Weber, W Schneider. 1998. Syringe exchange in Germany.. https://doi.org/10.3109/10826089809062209

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Clarification of registration requirements for individual practitioners. Final rule.

The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) is amending its registration regulations to make it clear that when an individual practitioner practices in more than one State, he or she must obtain a separate DEA registration for each State. This amendment will make it easier for practitioners to understand the requirements of the Controlled Substances Act and its implementing regulations.

Drug and Narcotic Control↗

The legal status of medical marijuana.

OBJECTIVE: To review the legal status of medical marijuana in the US. DATA SOURCES: Relevant publications were located using LexisNexis (1982-October 2006), WestLaw (1996-October 2006), BNA Health Law Reporter (1996-October 2006), MEDLINE (1996-October 2006), EMBASE (1980-October 2006), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-October 2006), and an Internet search targeting government sites using the key words medical marijuana. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Federal and state medical marijuana laws were examined. Relevant cannabinoid-based drug products were reviewed. Federal and State Supreme Court and Appeal level cases involving medical marijuana were evaluated. DATA SYNTHESIS: Marijuana is regulated as a Schedule I controlled substance and its use is prohibited under federal law. Dronabinol and nabilone are synthetic cannabinoids approved by the Food and Drug Administration and Sativex is a cannabis-based extract being evaluated in Phase III trials. The federal government sponsors a single patient compassionate use Investigational New Drug Application program providing medical marijuana for a small number of patients. Eleven states permit marijuana use for medical purposes and one state provides a defense of medical necessity. Employers do not have to provide workplace accommodations for employees using medical marijuana and can terminate them at will. Healthcare providers have First Amendment constitutional protections that allow them to discuss marijuana with patients. CONCLUSIONS: Until the Supreme Court rules directly on the constitutionality of state medical marijuana laws, a conflict remains. Marijuana use remains illegal under federal law and states assume their medical marijuana laws to be constitutional.

Drug and Narcotic Control↗