PubMed · 9599149
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
J P Lévy. 1998-05-08. AIDS vaccine development.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9599149/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Antibodies belonging to the VRC01-class display broad and potent neutralizing activities and have been isolated from several people living with HIV (PLWH). A member of that class, monoclonal antibody VRC01, was shown to reduce HIV-acquisition in two phase 2b efficacy trials. VRC01-class antibodies are therefore expected to be one component of an effective HIV-1 vaccine elicited response. In contrast to the VRC01-class antibodies that are highly mutated, their unmutated forms do not engage HIV-1 envelope (Env) and do not display neutralizing activities. Hence, specifically modified Env-derived proteins have been designed to engage the unmutated forms of VRC01-class antibodies, and to activate the corresponding naïve B cells. Selected heterologous Env must then be used as boost immunogens to guide the proper maturation of these elicited VRC01-class antibodies. Here we examined whether and how the valency of the prime and boost immunogens influences VRC01-class antibody-maturation. Our findings indicate that, indeed the valency of the immunogen affects the maturation of elicited antibody responses by preferentially selecting VRC01-like antibodies that have accumulated somatic mutations present in broadly neutralizing VRC01-class antibodies isolated from PLWH. As a result, antibodies isolated from animals immunized with the higher valency immunogens display broader Env cross-binding properties and improved neutralizing potentials than those isolated from animals immunized with the lower valency immunogens. Our results are relevant to current and upcoming phase 1 clinical trials that evaluate the ability of novel immunogens aiming to elicit cross-reactive VRC01-class antibody responses.
Development of a safe and effective vaccine for HIV is a major global priority. However, to date, efforts to design an HIV vaccine with methods used for development of other successful viral vaccines have not succeeded due to HIV diversity, HIV integration into the host genome, and ability of HIV to consistently evade anti-viral immune responses. Recent success in isolation of potent broadly neutralizing antibodies (bnAbs), in discovery of mechanisms of bnAb induction, and in discovery of atypical mechanisms of CD8T cell killing of HIV-infected cells, have opened new avenues for strategies for HIV vaccine design.
Fifty-two human immunodeficiency virus type 1, seronegative Thai adults from the community were enrolled in a double-blind, placebo controlled, phase I/II trial of HIV SF2 gp120/MF59 vaccine to determine the safety and immunogenicity of this recombinant, B clade, HIV envelope protein vaccine. Twenty-six subjects were enrolled at each of two sites in Thailand, Bangkok and Chiang Mai. Twelve subjects received placebo and 40 subjects received vaccine (50 microg). Subjects were immunized according to one of two schedules, 0, 1 and 4 or 0, 1 and 6 months. The frequency of adverse reactions was not different between placebo and vaccine subjects, nor between immunization schedules. Of vaccinees, all developed high-titer binding antibody to the immunogen (rgp120), 39 developed neutralizing antibody (NA) responses against homologous virus (HIV-1(SF2)), and 22 developed NA against heterologous virus (HIV-1(MN)). No subject demonstrated intercurrent HIV infection, however screening EIA reactivity occurred in 27% of recipients. Thus, this candidate HIV vaccine was found to be safe and immunogenic in Thai adults, laying the foundation for development of a subtype E construct in this population.