PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9599704

Reproduction and development.

Abstract

The currently developed and validated in vitro tests for female and male fertility and also for developmental toxicity are described and evaluated according to their potential use as screening or replacement alternatives to the established in vivo tests in reproductive and developmental toxicology. Alternative methods today can only be used to evaluate a few specific components of the integrated reproductive functions in both females and males. However, in the field of developmental toxicity testing there is a strong theoretical and empirical basis for the predictive power of in vitro screens using mammalian embryos as well as embryonic cells and tissues. Several of these assays have been validated or are currently undergoing validation in several laboratories and are > 80% concordant with in vivo results. Failure to achieve 100% accuracy reflects the inherent limitations of these systems, which are manageable, as the concordance rates are still good. The level of concordance suggests that these assays are adequate for screening purposes to complement traditional in vivo testing. The use of these assays as screens will save valuable in vivo testing resources for those compounds most likely to enter the market and to which people will be exposed.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H Spielmann. 1998. Reproduction and development.. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.98106571

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Draize rabbit eye test compatibility with eye irritation thresholds in humans: a quantitative structure-activity relationship analysis.

Draize rabbit eye test scores, as modified maximum average score (MMAS), for 68 pure bulk liquids were adjusted by the liquid-saturated vapor pressure P. These 68 adjusted scores, as log (MMAS/P), were shown to be completely equivalent to eye irritation thresholds (EIT), expressed as log (1/EIT), for 23 compounds in humans. Thus, for the first time the Draize eye test in rabbits for pure bulk liquids is shown to be perfectly compatible with eye irritation thresholds in humans. The total data set for 91 compounds was analyzed by the general solvation equation of Abraham. Values of log (MMAS/P) or log (1/EIT) could be fitted to a five-parameter equation with R2 = 0.936, SD = 0.433, AD = 0.000, and AAD = 0.340 over a range of 9.6 log units. When divided into a training set of 45 compounds, the corresponding equation could be used to predict the remaining 46 compounds in a test set with AD = -0.037 and AAD = 0.345 log units. Thus, the 91-compound equation can now be used to predict further EIT values to around 0.4 log units. It is suggested that the mechanism of action in the Draize test and in the human EIT involves passive transfer of the compound to a biophase that is quite polar, is a strong hydrogen bond base, a moderate hydrogen bond acid, and quite hydrophobic. The biophase does not resemble water or plasma, but resembles an organic solvent such as N-methylformamide.

Animal Testing Alternatives↗