PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 9618840

[Update on hepatitis C virus: its variability and the implications].

F Lunel·L Stuyver·C Brechot·G Maertens
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is the main etiologic factor of post-transfusional and sporadic hepatitis, called non-A non-B in the past. These infections are characterized by a very high number of chronic carriers always with a persistent viral increase, but often at a slow pace. The seriousness of liver disease differs from one individual to another, varying from an asymptomatic form with minor or no liver injuries, to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Physiopathological mechanisms involved in liver injuries are still poorly understood. The direct role of immune response and of possible genetic factors is still under study. This review aims at summing up the discovery of HCV, its structure, and its variability in the various genome regions in the same individual and from one individual to another. The different methods and techniques to analyze this variability are also reviewed, as well as the various suggested ways of classifying the different types. The geographical distribution and both clinical and biological consequences of this variability are also discussed.

Explore related subjects

Antibody SpecificityAntigenic VariationAntiviral AgentsCarcinoma, HepatocellularCarrier StateDrug Resistance, MicrobialGenetic VariationGenome, ViralGenotypeHepacivirusHepatitis CHepatitis C AntibodiesHumansInterferon-alphaLiver CirrhosisLiver NeoplasmsPolymerase Chain ReactionPolymorphism, Restriction Fragment LengthRNA, ViralSerotypingSpecies SpecificityTransfusion ReactionViral Hepatitis VaccinesViral Nonstructural ProteinsViral ProteinsVirionVirulenceJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

F Lunel, L Stuyver, C Brechot, G Maertens. 1998. [Update on hepatitis C virus: its variability and the implications].. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1246-7820(98)80005-0

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Isolation and characterization of phage-displayed single chain antibodies recognizing nonreducing terminal mannose residues. 2. Expression, purification, and characterization of recombinant single chain antibodies.

Since phage-display technology is probably the best available strategy to produce antibodies directed against various carbohydrate moieties, we employed phage-display technology to generate human single chain antibodies (scFvs) using neoglycolipids as carbohydrate antigens. An accompanying paper in this issue describes how phage-displayed antibodies (phage Abs) that recognized nonreducing terminal mannose residues were isolated and characterized. In this study, four independent scFv genes, isolated by a mannotriose (Man3)-bearing lipid as an antigen as previously described, were used to construct expression vectors to produce soluble scFv proteins in quantity. Both bacterial and mammalian expression systems were used to produce glutathione S-transferase-scFv fusion proteins and scFv-human IgG1 Fc conjugates, respectively. The expressed scFv fusion proteins were purified to apparent homogeneity with yields of approximately 1 and 48 mg, from 1 L of bacterial culture and myeloma cell media, respectively. Surface plasmon resonance and ELISA analyses confirmed that purified scFv proteins showed Man3 specificity. The humanized antibody in scFv-Fc form, derived from clone 5A3, was a disulfide-liked dimer with a molecular mass of 108 kDa. According to a bivalent model, the kinetics parameters of its binding to Man3 were determined to be ka = 4.03 x 104 M-1 s-1, kd = 5.77 x 10-4 s-1, KA = 6.98 x 107 M-1, and KD = 1.43 x 10-8 M. This study thus established the foundation for isolation of carbohydrate-specific scFv genes and eventual production of humanized scFv-Fc type antibodies.

Antibody Specificity↗
PubMed2007

Generation of plant protein microarrays and investigation of antigen-antibody interactions.

The application of proteomics methods, such as the protein microarray technology, in plant science has been strongly supported by the completion of genome sequencing projects of Arabidopsis thaliana and rice. In this chapter we describe a method to generate plant protein microarrays and to use them for characterizing monoclonal antibodies or polyclonal sera with regard to their specificity and cross-reactivity. The method starts with characterized E. coli cDNA expression clones encoding His-tagged plant proteins. After expression and purification of these recombinant proteins in high throughput, protein microarrays are generated utilizing a contact printer. For the detection of the recombinant proteins on the microarrays, an anti-RGS-His6 antibody is used. To characterize specific antibodies, the microarrays are incubated with the respective antibody solutions followed by fluorescently labeled secondary antibodies. Signal detection is performed by means of an arrayscanner system. Protein microarrays containing the whole proteome of a plant will represent the ideal format to test antibody specificity and cross-reactivity in the future.

Antibody Specificity↗
PubMed2006

Standardization of FSH, LH and hCG--current position and future prospects.

Gonadotropin measurements contribute significantly to patient management in both endocrinology and oncology. Differences in calibration, antibody specificities and assay design mean that gonadotropin results obtained in different methods are still not comparable. Comparing patient results obtained in different methods therefore remains problematic, whether for individual patient care, when assessing the results of multicentre clinical trials, or when formulating national and international guidelines and recommendations. Achieving improved comparability of results for these important analytes will require clear descriptive nomenclature, accurate calibration with highly purified standards, careful characterization of what gonadotropin isoforms methods are measuring, broad recommendations about the most clinically appropriate antibody combinations, and increased awareness of clinically relevant interferences and the action required to minimise their effect. Encouraging manufacturers to standardize and carefully describe the evaluation methods they use, such that data from different manufacturers can readily be compared, is also a pre-requisite for future progress.

Antibody Specificity↗