PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 9626864

Can MRCP replace ERCP?

Abstract

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) has replaced direct cholangiography and pancreatography in many instances. Its complete noninvasiveness and flexibility are less onerous for patients. For the use of screening as well as scrutiny, MRCP has played an important role in diagnosing various pathologies in this field. The usefulness of MRCP is not limited to anatomical evaluations; it can also yield physiologic and functional information. From a cost-performance basis, MRCP is undoubtedly superior to direct methods. Coupled with a cutting-edge MR system, MRCP has the potential to limit the use of invasive transpapillary and percutaneous methods merely to interventional purposes. In the near future, the emergence of interventional MR scanners will make MRCP even more competitive, and the replacement will be accelerated.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Y Takehara. Can MRCP replace ERCP?. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.1880080303

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Reuse of disposable sphincterotomes for diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a one-year prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Although previous studies have documented that single-channel sphincterotomes can be sterilized and used up to 10 times, no studies have prospectively evaluated the reuse of disposable sphincterotomes. METHODS: Five- and six-French double-channel sphincterotomes marketed as one-time-use only were manually cleaned, sterilized with ethylene oxide, and used up to 10 times. Over a 1-year period, total number of uses as a cannulation or cutting device, reason for sphincterotome dysfunction, possible infectious complications were evaluated, and cost-savings associated with reuse were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean number of times sphincterotomes could be used in our institution was 3.4; a broken or stiff cutting wire was the main reason for discard. There were two infectious complications during the study period. Both were experienced by patients with unrelieved obstruction treated with new sphincterotomes. Contingent on the method used, total savings related to sphincterotome reuse was approximately $66,000. CONCLUSIONS: Double-channel sphincterotomes marketed as one-time-use items can be reused safely when properly cleaned. Reuse was associated with significant cost savings in our institution.

Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde