PubMed · 9631052
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
L Gold. 1996. Reflections on mirrors.. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0996-1080
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
The electrical conductivity of DNA is dependent on its conformational state. We demonstrate here that such a dependence may be harnessed for the electronic sensing of external analytes, for instance, adenosine. Such a DNA sensor incorporates an analyte "receptor", whose altered conformation in the presence of bound analyte switches the conformation, and hence, the conductive path between two DNA double-helical stems. Two distinct designs for such sensors are described here, that permit significant electrical conduction through a "detector" double-helical stem only in the presence of the bound analyte. In the first design, current flows through the analyte receptor itself, whereas in the second, current flows in a path adjacent to the receptor. The former design may be especially suitable for certain categories of analytes, including heterocycle-containing compounds such as adenosine, whereas the latter design should be generally applicable to the detection of any molecular analyte, large or small. Since analyte detection in these DNA sensors is electronic, the potential exists for their application in rapid and automated chip-based detection of small molecules as well as of proteins and other macromolecules.
Effects of adenosine on voltage-gated Ca(2+) channel currents and on arginine vasopressin (AVP) and oxytocin (OT) release from isolated neurohypophysial (NH) terminals of the rat were investigated using perforated-patch clamp recordings and hormone-specific radioimmunoassays. Adenosine, but not adenosine 5'-triphosphate (ATP), dose-dependently and reversibly inhibited the transient component of the whole-terminal Ba(2+) currents, with an IC(50) of 0.875 microM. Adenosine strongly inhibited, in a dose-dependent manner (IC(50) = 2.67 microM), depolarization-triggered AVP and OT release from isolated NH terminals. Adenosine and the N-type Ca(2+) channel blocker omega-conotoxin GVIA, but not other Ca(2+) channel-type antagonists, inhibited the same transient component of the Ba(2+) current. Other components such as the L-, Q- and R-type channels, however, were insensitive to adenosine. Similarly, only adenosine and omega-conotoxin GVIA were able to inhibit the same component of AVP release. A(1) receptor agonists, but not other purinoceptor-type agonists, inhibited the same transient component of the Ba(2+) current as adenosine. Furthermore, the A(1) receptor antagonist 8-cyclopentyltheophylline (CPT), but not the A(2) receptor antagonist 3, 7-dimethyl-1-propargylxanthine (DMPGX), reversed inhibition of this current component by adenosine. The inhibition of AVP and OT release also appeared to be via the A(1) receptor, since it was reversed by CPT. We therefore conclude that adenosine, acting via A(1) receptors, specifically blocks the terminal N-type Ca(2+) channel thus leading to inhibition of the release of both AVP and OT.
BACKGROUND: Brain death has been shown to decrease graft function and survival in rodent models. The aim of this study was to evaluate how brain death affects graft viability in the donor and liver tolerance to cold preservation as assessed by survival in a canine transplant model. METHODS: Beagle dogs were used for the study. Non-brain dead (BD) donors served as controls. Brain death was induced by sudden inflation of a subdural balloon catheter with continuous monitoring of arterial blood pressure and electroencephalographic activity. Sixteen hours after confirmation of brain death, liver grafts were retrieved. All livers were flushed in situ and preserved for 24 hr in cold University of Wisconsin solution before transplantation. Recipient survival rates, serum hepatic enzyme levels, coagulation, and metabolic parameters of the recipients were analyzed. RESULTS: No significant changes were observed in serum aminotransferases (alanine and aspartate transaminases) and lactate dehydrogenase levels in the BD donor. After preservation, control (n=6) and BD livers (n=5) showed full functional recovery after transplant with 100% survival in both groups at day 7. There was no significant difference in peak serum alanine, aspartate transaminases, and lactate dehydrogenase after transplantation in recipients who received a liver from BD donor compared to control group. BD livers were functionally as capable as control livers in correcting metabolic acidosis during the first 24 hr posttransplantation. Coagulation profiles (index normalized ratio, activated partial thromboplastin time) after reperfusion were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: In contrast to previous reports in rodent models, our study shows that brain death does not cause significant liver dysfunction in the donor before organ removal. Donor brain death and prolonged liver graft preservation do not interact significantly to impair liver function and survival after transplantation.