PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 9647961

A psychophysiological approach to assessing premature ejaculation.

D L Rowland
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A hierarchical psychophysiological model is described that provides a working framework for clinicians interested in addressing issues related to premature ejaculation (PE). Within this framework, psychophysiological laboratory analysis, used in conjunction with conventional self-report measures, has potential to contribute both to the measurement and understanding of premature ejaculation and to the assessment of treatment procedures aimed at alleviating PE.

Explore related subjects

EjaculationHumansMaleSexual Dysfunctions, PsychologicalJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D L Rowland. 1998. A psychophysiological approach to assessing premature ejaculation.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9647961/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Efficacy of sildenafil citrate in treatment of erectile dysfunction: impact of associated premature ejaculation and low desire.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of premature ejaculation (PE) and low desire on the efficacy and satisfaction rate of sildenafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). METHODS: A total of 586 male patients with ED in association with and without PE or low desire were enrolled in this study. Patients were screened for ED using the International Index for Erectile Function. All patients were also screened for PE and low desire. We compared the responses to the erectile function domain, questions 3 and 4, before and after sildenafil in patients with and without PE or low desire. Overall satisfaction and global efficacy question responses were also assessed in all patients. RESULTS: The mean age +/- SD was 58 +/- 6.4 years. Significant associations were found between the increased duration and severity of ED and the decreased rate of overall satisfaction. Before sildenafil administration, significant differences were found in the erectile function domain, Q3 and Q4 between patients with and without PE or low desire. After sildenafil administration, no significant differences were found in those assessment variables and the presence or absence of PE and low desire. No significant differences were found between the global efficacy question response and the overall satisfaction rate between patients with and without PE or low desire. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of sildenafil was negatively affected by an increased duration and severity of ED; however, global efficacy and overall patient satisfaction were not attenuated by PE or low desire.

Ejaculation↗