PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9654308

Antibiotic prophylaxis.

Abstract

During the past 30 years, antibiotic prophylaxis has proved of enormous efficacy in reducing the incidence of surgical wound infections, postoperative morbidity and mortality, the duration of the postoperative period, and the overall cost of surgical treatment. In this paper, the timing and route of administration of antibiotic prophylaxis as well as the dosage and duration, the indications for antibiotic prophylaxis, the importance of the alterations of the delayed hypersensitivity response, and the value of antibiotic prophylaxis for prevention of postoperative septic complications in anergic patients are analyzed. The possibility of combining antibiotic prophylaxis with immunoprophylaxis for high-risk patients is also analyzed.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M A Cainzos. 1998. Antibiotic prophylaxis.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9654308/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Routine prophylactic antibiotic use in the management of snakebite.

BACKGROUND: Routine antibiotic prophylaxis following snakebite is not recommended but evidence suggests that it may be common practice in Zimbabwe. This study set out to determine and describe the extent of this practice at Parirenyatwa Hospital, a large teaching hospital in Zimbabwe METHODS: A retrospective case review (1996 to 1999 inclusive) of all cases of snakebite was undertaken at Parirenyatwa Hospital. Cases with a diagnosis of snakebite, presenting within 24 hours of the bite and with no complications or concurrent illness were defined as "routine prophylactic antibiotic use". RESULTS: From 78 cases which satisfied the inclusion criteria, 69 (88.5%) received antibiotics. Ten different antibiotics from 6 different classes were used with penicillins the most commonly prescribed (benzylpenicillin in 29% of cases, alone or in combination). Over 40% of antibiotics were given parenterally although all patients were conscious on admission. The total cost of antibiotics used was estimated at US$522.98. CONCLUSION: Routine prophylactic use of antibiotics in snakebite at Parirenyatwa Hospital is common practice. This may highlight the lack of a clearly defined policy leading to wasteful inappropriate antibiotic use which is costly and may promote bacterial antibiotic resistance. Further work is required to investigate the reasons for this practice and to design appropriate interventions to counter it.

Antibiotic Prophylaxis↗

Long-term infection rates associated with the pectoral versus abdominal approach to cardioverter- defibrillator implants.

Infection is an uncommon (0% to 6.7%) but serious complication after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation. All ICD primary implants, replacements, or revisions performed at the Massachusetts General Hospital between April 1983 and May 1999 were reviewed. A total of 21 ICD-related infections (1.2%) were identified among 1,700 procedures affecting 1.8% of the 1,170 patients who underwent a primary implant, a generator change, or a revision of their systems. The mean follow-up time was 35 +/- 33 months. Of the 959 patients with long-term follow-up, 19 of the 584 patients (3.2%) with abdominal and 2 of the 375 patients (0.5%) with pectoral systems developed ICD-related infections (p = 0.03). There was no significant difference between the infection rate among the 959 primary ICD implants and the 447 replacements or system revisions. Only 5 of the patients (24%) had systemic signs of infection, including fever (T>100.5) and elevated white blood count >12,000. Cultures from the wound revealed staphylococcal species in 16 patients (76%). Nineteen patients were treated with removal of the entire ICD system in addition to intravenous antibiotics for 2 to 4 weeks. A decrease in the incidence of ICD-related infection has occurred since the advent of transvenous pectoral systems. The main organism responsible for ICD infection is Staphylococcus. The mainstay of ICD infection management consists of complete removal of the entire implanted system.

Antibiotic Prophylaxis↗

['Evidence-based' perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis policy in Belgian hospitals after a change in the reimbursement system].

The costs of antibiotics in Belgian hospitals are nearly fully reimbursed by the health insurance. Such a situation is not conductive to rational drug use. A new reimbursement system for perioperatively-administered antibiotics in Belgian hospitals was implemented in May 1997 by Royal Decree. A reimbursement code for antibiotic use was linked to the reimbursement of surgical interventions. This code represents a reimbursement which covers 75% of the cost of perioperative prophylaxis based on optimal indication, dose, and duration as recommended by international and Belgian consensus guidelines. The actual antibiotic prescribed during the 72-hour perioperative period (the day before, during and after surgery) is reimbursed at only 25% of its full cost. Thus, if the perioperative prophylactic antibiotic regimen complies with the evidence-based guidelines, the costs of antibiotic prescribing will be fully reimbursed by the health insurance (75% of the standard +25% of the actual costs). The new reimbursement system does not apply to antibiotics which are prescribed for treatment of intercurrent infections; these antibiotics continue to be fully reimbursed. Annual expenditures for antibiotics, for both antibiotic treatment and prophylaxis, nationwide and per hospital, have shown marked improvements in perioperative antibiotic use after the decree was implemented. Surgeons' adherence to the evidence-based standard of prophylactic antibiotic use has improved over time. In conclusion, rapid implementation of the perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis policy was achieved through changes in the reimbursement of antibiotics for surgery patients.

Antibiotic Prophylaxis↗