Object recognition using spatiotemporal signatures.

J V Stone

doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00301-5

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 9666977

Object recognition using spatiotemporal signatures.

J V Stone

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The sequence of images generated by motion between observer and object specifies a spatiotemporal signature for that object. Evidence is presented that such spatiotemporal signatures are used in object recognition. Subjects learned novel, three-dimensional, rotating objects from image sequences in a continuous recognition task. During learning, the temporal order of images of a given object was constant. During testing, the order of images in each sequence was reversed, relative to its order during learning. This image sequence reversal produced significant reaction time increases and recognition rate decreases. Results are interpreted in terms of object-specific spatiotemporal signatures.

Explore related subjects

Form Perception Humans Learning Movement Reaction Time Retina Rotation Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

J V Stone. 1998. Object recognition using spatiotemporal signatures.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00301-5

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2002

Generic and non-generic conditions for the perception of surface shape from texture.

Li and Zaidi (Vision Research 40 (2000) 217; 41 (2001) 1519) have recently argued that there are two necessary conditions for the perception of 3D shape from texture: (1) the texture pattern must have a disproportionate amount of energy along directions of principal curvature; and (2) the surface must be viewed with a noticeable amount of perspective. In the present article we present evidence that these conclusions are only valid under a limited set of non-generic viewing conditions. Other relevant factors that need to be considered in this context include the distribution of curvature on an object's surface and the set of possible viewing directions from which it can be observed. For generic viewing directions and patterns of curvature, the perception of surface curvature from texture is only minimally affected by the orientation spectrum of the texture pattern or the amount perspective in its optical projection. Li and Zaidi (Vision Research 41 (2001) 1519) have also identified two characteristic patterns of image contours, which they claim to be the only possible source of information within textured images for determining the direction of surface slant or the sign of surface curvature. In the present article we attempt to show that these characteristic patterns can only arise in natural vision for a limited set of non-generic viewing directions. We also review several other factors that can influence the perceived direction of slant or the perceived sign of curvature, which have been identified previously by other investigators.

Form Perception↗

PubMed2002

Perceptual organization overcomes the effects of local surround in determining simultaneous lightness contrast.

Lightness induction can occur on the basis of the immediate surround of a region (local interactions) and also on the basis of global factors of perceptual organization. The experiments reported in this article used novel displays that made it possible to differentiate the contributions of these two kinds offactors. The experiments demonstrated, for the first time, that when higher-level factors act contemporaneously with lower-level factors, the contrast effect induced by the global-organization principle of perceptual belongingness overcomes the effect due to retinal lateral inhibition.

Form Perception↗

PubMed2001

Self-motion and the perception of stationary objects.

One of the ways that we perceive shape is through seeing motion. Visual motion may be actively generated (for example, in locomotion), or passively observed. In the study of the perception of three-dimensional structure from motion, the non-moving, passive observer in an environment of moving rigid objects has been used as a substitute for an active observer moving in an environment of stationary objects; this 'rigidity hypothesis' has played a central role in computational and experimental studies of structure from motion. Here we show that this is not an adequate substitution because active and passive observers can perceive three-dimensional structure differently, despite experiencing the same visual stimulus: active observers' perception of three-dimensional structure depends on extraretinal information about their own movements. The visual system thus treats objects that are stationary (in an allocentric, earth-fixed reference frame) differently from objects that are merely rigid. These results show that action makes an important contribution to depth perception, and argue for a revision of the rigidity hypothesis to incorporate the special case of stationary objects.

Form Perception↗