PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9666994

Stimulus uncertainty affects velocity discrimination.

Abstract

Velocity discrimination thresholds were determined for 1 c/deg drifting gratings when uncertainty about the reference velocity was introduced by interleaving stimuli with different reference velocities from trial to trial. When drifting gratings with reference velocities spanning 4 octaves (1-16 deg/sec) were mixed randomly within a series of trials, the velocity discrimination threshold for a 4 deg/sec stimulus increased by more than a factor of 3. The threshold elevation decreased as the range of interleaved velocities was reduced from 4 to approx. 0.75 octaves, below which velocity interleaving had little effect. In contrast, when gratings that spanned a 4-octave range in spatial frequency were interleaved on successive trials, velocity discrimination for 4 deg/sec was essentially unaffected. Our results indicate that the psychophysical mechanisms underlying velocity discrimination are not spatial-frequency specific, but are turned to the velocity or speed of the stimulus.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Y Chen, H E Bedell, L J Frishman, D M Levi. 1998. Stimulus uncertainty affects velocity discrimination.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00282-4

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Discrimination training alters object representations in human extrastriate cortex.

Visual object recognition relies critically on learning. However, little is known about the effect of object learning in human visual cortex, and in particular how the spatial distribution of training effects relates to the distribution of object and face selectivity across the cortex before training. We scanned human subjects with high-resolution functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while they viewed novel object classes, both before and after extensive training to discriminate between exemplars within one of these object classes. Training increased the strength of the response in visual cortex to trained objects compared with untrained objects. However, training did not simply induce a uniform increase in the response to trained objects: the magnitude of this training effect varied substantially across subregions of extrastriate cortex, with some showing a twofold increase in response to trained objects and others (including the right fusiform face area) showing no significant effect of training. Furthermore, the spatial distribution of training effects could not be predicted from the spatial distribution of either pretrained responses or face selectivity. Instead, training changed the spatial distribution of activity across the cortex. These findings support a dynamic view of the ventral visual pathway in which the cortical representation of an object category is continuously modulated by experience.

Discrimination, Psychological↗

3D shape discrimination using relative disparity derivatives.

Three-dimensional (3D) shape discrimination could be achieved using relative disparity signals or it could be achieved using a higher-order disparity derivative detector. Two 3D shape discrimination tasks were used to distinguish between these possibilities: a within-shape task and a between-shape task. Disparity thresholds were larger when discriminating within the same shape than when discriminating between shapes. More importantly, within-shape discriminations were dependent on the pedestal disparity (distance from fixation) whereas between-shape discriminations were not. The results suggest that a mechanism sensitive to higher-order disparity derivatives can achieve discrimination between different 3D shapes.

Discrimination, Psychological↗

Learning alters local face space geometry.

The effects of learning on the geometry of face space were investigated by measuring thresholds for discrimination and recognition of synthetic faces. This was based on a novel experimental technique that permitted measurement of psychometric functions for face recognition. Two major results were obtained. First, thresholds for face recognition were significantly better than thresholds for discrimination among novel faces. Second, rapid discrimination in the neighborhood of learned faces was better than discrimination near novel faces. Control experiments showed that this discrimination improvement occurred only with learned faces, and it could not be explained by generalized discrimination learning. Thus, face learning selectively alters or distorts face space in the vicinity of learned faces. This alteration may be due to an improvement in the signal/noise ratio as a result of face learning.

Discrimination, Psychological↗