PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9673668

An efficient method for correcting the edge artifact due to smoothing.

Abstract

Spatial smoothing is a common pre-processing step in the analysis of functional brain imaging data. It can increase sensitivity to signals of specific shapes and sizes (Rosenfeld and Kak [1982]: Digital Picture Processing, vol. 2. Orlando, Fla.: Academic; Worsley et al. [1996]: Hum Brain Mapping 4:74-90). Also, some amount of spatial smoothness is required if methods from the theory of Gaussian random fields are to be used (Holmes [1994]: Statistical Issues in Functional Brain Mapping. PhD thesis, University of Glasgow). Smoothing is most often implemented as a convolution of the imaging data with a smoothing kernel, and convolution is most efficiently performed using the Convolution Theorem and the Fast Fourier Transform (Cooley and Tukey [1965]: Math Comput 19:297-301; Priestly [1981]: Spectral Analysis and Time Series. San Diego: Academic; Press et al. [1992]: Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). An undesirable side effect of smoothing is an artifact along the edges of the brain, where brain voxels become smoothed with non-brain voxels. This results in a dark rim which might be mistaken for hypoactivity. In this short methodological paper, we present a method for correcting functional brain images for the edge artifact due to smoothing, while retaining the use of the Convolution Theorem and the Fast Fourier Transform for efficient calculation of convolutions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J M Maisog, J Chmielowska. 1998. An efficient method for correcting the edge artifact due to smoothing.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9673668/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Striping artifact removal in VisiumHD data through nuclear counts modeling.

MOTIVATION: 10x Genomics VisiumHD enables spatial transcriptomics at 2 µm × 2 µm resolution but exhibits slide-specific, non-periodic striping artifacts due to lane-width variability. These multiplicative row/column effects distort bin total counts and can bias downstream analyses. The state-of-the-art destriping approach is the normalization procedure used as a preprocessing step in bin2cell; it applies sequential high-quantile row- then column-wise normalization, which is asymmetric and can introduce edge effects/macro-stripes and distortions of large-scale total-count structure. RESULTS: We propose a statistical destriping approach that leverages nuclei segmentation from the co-registered H&E image. Assuming transcript abundance is constant within each nucleus, we model bin counts with a negative binomial distribution whose mean is a product of a nucleus-specific concentration and row- and column-specific stripe-factors reflecting lane-width variation. We fit all parameters in a generalized linear modeling framework with cross-validated regularization on stripe-factors and iterative dispersion estimation, and use the fitted parameters to correct the observed counts into a destriped image. On synthetic data with known ground truth, our method improves stripe-factor estimation accuracy and reduces error in corrected counts relative to bin2cell and bin2cell-derived baselines. Across four public VisiumHD slides, it consistently lowers striping intensity while substantially better preserving biological signal present in the large-scale global count structure and avoiding the artifacts introduced by other methods. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All source code and links to publicly available data used for this study are available at https://github.com/paolamalsot/destriping-GLM.

Artifacts↗

Impairment of echocardiographic acoustic window caused by breast implants.

Cosmetic breast implants are increasing in popularity. The presence of a breast implant overlying the anterior mediastinal space as a cause of impairment of the echocardiographic acoustic window has not been described previously. Here, we report three cases with significant impairment of echocardiographic acoustic window caused by breast implants. Clinicians should be aware of this interference and women should be informed of this dilemma before considering this cosmetic surgery.

Artifacts↗