PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 9686077

[Right ventricular function: physiological and physiopathological features].

Abstract

Sinus and conus constitute the two cavities of the right ventricle. They are anatomically and functionally different. The sinus is a flow-generator and the conus a pressure-regulator. The coronary circulation of the right ventricle is provided by the right coronary artery and the left anterior descending artery. The right ventricle is perfused during systole and diastole. When oxygen demand increases, coronary arteries dilate and oxygen extraction rises. As for the left ventricle, right ventricular performance depends upon heart rate, rhythm, contractility and loading conditions. Ventricular interactions are very important for right ventricular function. Loading conditions and contractility of the left ventricle are of major significance for right ventricular performance. For the right ventricle, the end of the ejection is different from the end of the active contraction. The time between them allows to achieve ventricular emptying. This duration is linked to afterload. Presently, it is impossible to accurately and simply assess these conditions. Pressure and volume overloadings result in right ventricular failure. They are responsible for ventricular dilation and ischaemia with a decrease in cardiac output, generating a vicious circle. Treatment includes the removal of the cause, and the maintenance of systemic arterial pressure and biventricular contractility. It is difficult to assess the effects of intravenous vasodilators on right ventricular afterload.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Stephanazzi, C Guidon-Attali, J Escarment. 1997. [Right ventricular function: physiological and physiopathological features].. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0750-7658(97)87197-3

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Transmyocardial laser revascularization: effect of laser parameters on tissue ablation and cardiac perfusion.

Dr. Mahmood Mirhoseini from Milwaukee, WI, transformed transmyocardial revascularization (TMR) into transmyocardial laser revascularization (TMLR) more than 2 decades ago. The controversial nature of this laser procedure and the prospect of its successful application to refractory cases of chronic debilitating angina have created spirited interest in TMLR. As a natural component of this interest, various laser modalities have been proposed and employed during the performance of the TMLR procedure both in the experimental and the clinical setting. However, it is the nature of laser-tissue interactions that is primarily responsible for the long-term fate of the channels, the angiogenesis that occurs in the vicinity of these laser channels, and the resulting increase (if any) in myocardial perfusion. These interactions with tissue are, in turn, determined by laser variables such as photonic absorption and scattering by the target tissue, pulse energy and duration, and the peak power generated. The CO2 laser has the advantages of producing high-energy pulses that create a transmural channel with a single pulse, low-peak power that minimizes structural tissue trauma, and high photonic absorption to minimize thermal damage. The holmium:YAG and excimer lasers, in turn, have the advantage of being coupled to a fiber optic catheter for transluminal endocardial delivery. Importantly, long-term clinical and perfusional data showing a cause and effect relationship between the use of TMLR and these end-points are available for the CO2 laser only. Prospective randomized trials are, therefore, warranted to delineate the use of each laser modality in relation to that of the CO2 laser in the TMLR setting.

Coronary Circulation