PubMed · 969959
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
J Speck. 1976. [Checking of technical work devices].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/969959/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
In a questionnaire sent out to general practitioners (GP) in the County of Funen they reported a yearly incidence of lesions penetrating the skin of 1.2 per practitioner. Approximately half of these lesions were potentially infectious. Sixty percent of the lesions were due to accidents involving needles. Only 52% of the GPs with the risk of a potentially infectious lesion tried to prevent infection. We estimate that the risk of becoming infected with HIV or Hepatitis-B infection is very low. It is necessary to get GPs to change procedures in an attempt to minimize the risk.
The study describes the mechanisms of percutaneous blood exposure (PCE) among Danish doctors and discusses rational strategies for prevention. Data were obtained as part of a nation-wide survey of occupational blood exposure. The most recent percutaneous or mucocutaneous exposure within the previous three months was described. Of 9375 doctors, 6005 (64%) participated. A total of 971 PCE were described. Inattentiveness contributed to 30.5%. Use of fingers rather than instruments was a contributing cause of 36.9% of 483 PCE on suture needles. Common concomitant causes in such cases (n = 199) were poor space in (30.2%) or view of (18.6%) the operation field. Of 689 PCE in surgical specialties, 17.4% were inflicted by colleagues. Up to 53.3% of PCE on hollow-bore needles could be attributed to unsafe routines only. In conclusion, education in safer working routines are needed in all specialties. Introduction of safer devices should have a high priority in surgical specialties, and should be considered in non-surgical specialties too.
In a nation-wide survey among Danish doctors, the compliance and reasons for non-compliance with universal precautions (UP) and the associated circumstances of mucocutaneous blood exposure (MCE) were studied. Of 9384 questionnaires, 6256 (67%) were returned and 6005 were eligible for analysis. Only 35% complied with the basic principles of UP. Compliance with protective barrier use in surgical versus non-surgical specialties was: Gloves 63.0% and 23.4%, masks 55.2% and 17.6% and protective eyewear 11.5% and 4.0% respectively. Common given reasons for non-compliance were: "Interferes with working skills", "forget", "wear spectacles", "not available", "too much trouble to get" or "gloves do not fit". Of 741 MCE described in detail, an estimated 84-98% were potentially preventable if appropriate barriers had been worn. More than half of MCE were preventable by two interventions only: Compulsory use of protective eyewear during operations and of gloves during insertion of peripheral i.v.-catheters. In conclusion compliance with UP is unacceptably low and the majority of MCE were potentially preventable if appropriate barriers had been worn.