PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9720133

Functional outcome assessment in dysarthria.

Abstract

Strategies for the functional assessment of communication disorders experienced by persons with dysarthria can be based on the Chronic Disabilities Model described by Nagi (1991), which considers a disorders at five different levels, ranging from pathophysiology at the level of the tissue to the societal levels of dysfunction. Outcomes can be measured at all levels of the model. For example, at the pathophysiologic level, outcomes may indicate events at the tissue level during the course of the disease, whereas, at the level of the disability, outcomes reveal the adequacy of speech production using compensatory strategies in communicative contexts, and at the societal level, they may indicate the overall degree of success a speaker has in specific real-world speaking situations. This article focuses on "functional" assessment of persons with dysarthria. Thus, assessment is viewed from the perspective of how speech and the use of speech can be measured in functional situations over time or as a result of treatment.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

K C Hustad, D R Beukelman, K M Yorkston. 1998. Functional outcome assessment in dysarthria.. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1064051

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Methods of evaluation of musician's dystonia: critique of measurement tools.

Musician's dystonia is associated with significant morbidity. To assess treatment options, accurate and precise measurements of disease severity are critical. We describe current methods of quantitatively measuring musician's dystonia of the upper extremity including subjective, objective, and automated methods. The degree to which these methods satisfy rigorous measurement criteria, including their reliability, validity, responsiveness to treatment, and practicality, is examined. We report that most of these methods have not been properly evaluated. Therefore, treatment trials based on these methods are difficult to interpret.

Disability Evaluation↗

[Compensation for tinnitus in private accident insurance].

According to the provisions of private accident insurance, mental or psychic reactions are excluded from compensation. Until now, tinnitus was taken as fully psychic and therefore excluded. In two recently published judgments of the Federal Supreme Court in Germany the assessment of tinnitus in private accident insurance and particularly the exclusion clause section sign 2 Abs. 4 AUB 88 has been newly defined. According to this actual jurisdiction the compensation of tinnitus could be possible, when as physical underlying reason a proved harm in the inner ear or the auditory pathway (hearing loss), which can be traced back to the accident according to the rules of causality. This leads to the question how Tinnitus could be compensated without modification of the general terms and conditions of the private accident insurance. A compensating table is proposed, which recognizes the somatic (physical) part of tinnitus and is based on medical and scientific findings of the relation between hearing loss and tinnitus.

Disability Evaluation↗