PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 9727218

Financing assertive community treatment.

Abstract

Assertive community treatment (ACT) is a widely-used intervention for the most severely impaired persons with mental illness. Because it differs from traditional treatment approaches in its philosophy, its organization, and in the clients it serves, financing strategies that are appropriate for standard services may not be optimal for ACT. In developing new payment systems, policymakers must choose between targeted strategies that attempt to influence the treatment process directly and those that establish broad goals for effectiveness, access, and efficiency while allowing providers more latitude in the treatment process. These choices profoundly influence how and to whom ACT is available.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R E Clark. 1997. Financing assertive community treatment.. https://doi.org/10.1023/a%3A1022295123179

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Systematic review of the effect of on-site mental health professionals on the clinical behaviour of general practitioners.

OBJECTIVES: To review the published literature concerning the effects of on-site mental health professionals on general practitioners' management of mental health. DESIGN: Systematic review of controlled trials. SETTING: Primary care. PARTICIPANTS: General practitioners and mental health professionals. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Consultation rates, prescribing of psychotropics, and referrals to secondary care mental health services by general practitioners. RESULTS: The effect of on-site mental health professionals on consultation rates was inconsistent. Referral to a mental health professional reduced the likelihood of a patient receiving a prescription for psychotropics or being referred to secondary care, although the effects were not consistent. An on-site mental health professional did not alter prescribing and referral behaviour towards patients in the wider practice population. CONCLUSIONS: The secondary effects of mental health professionals on the clinical behaviour of general practitioners are comparatively modest and inconsistent and seem to be restricted to patients directly under the care of the mental health professional.

Community Mental Health Services