PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9734123

[Shared care in BPH. First national experience].

Abstract

The high prevalence of Benign Prostate Hyperplasia and the increased demand for care of this condition, should compel us to plan for shared care models in parallel to Primary Care, in the way it has happened with entities such as HBP and Diabetes. The set of measurements to be adopted when sharing services with primary care is known as "shared care". This paper presents the first national experience of "shared care" with primary care in BPH. The project has consisted in a series of steps to increase awareness, train and make available for family physicians, a clinical practice guide defining the criteria for initial evaluation, medical treatment and referral of patients to Urology surgeries, including with the referral document the appropriate diagnostic tests. A Quality Commission has been created to study the level of compliance of the documentation used for referral to the specialist and the clinical histories of patients treated in primary care. The results obtained are significant and most studies carried out fulfill the requirements in 60% cases, which has allowed to reduce overcrowding in the Urology outpatient offices (4200 surgery visits saved/year in our environment), has provided easy access of patients to adequate diagnosis and treatment, as well as significant financial savings (30 million pesetas/year). In short "shared care" is a reality in our environment that allows a more effective, fast medical assistance and improved access to specialist care by reducing the demand of specialized surgery hours.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Padilla León, C Marchal Escalona, J Caballero Alcántara, F Padilla León, I M Lucas de Vega. 1998. [Shared care in BPH. First national experience].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9734123/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A comparison of assertive community treatment and intensive case management for patients in rural areas.

OBJECTIVE: This article reviews the evidence for the effectiveness of community-based services for rural areas, specifically assertive community treatment and intensive case management. Service delivery to persons with severe mental illness in rural areas is challenged by low population densities, limited services, and shortages of professionals. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search identified six studies of rural assertive community treatment, only two of which were controlled studies, and four rural intensive case management studies, only one of which was a controlled study. Assertive community treatment would seem ideally suited to areas lacking services because of its self-contained multidisciplinary treatment team approach. However, rural programs have been forced to make several adaptations to the assertive community treatment model, including smaller teams, less comprehensive staff, and less intensive services. There is no published evidence that these adaptations are able to produce the same results as full-fidelity teams. Some believe that intensive case management may be an alternative to assertive community treatment in rural settings because intensive case management emphasizes individual caseloads, fewer staff, less intensive contacts, and brokered services. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence suggests that intensive case management programs are effective only in community settings where there is an ample supply of treatment and support services. To build the evidence base for the effectiveness of these models, much more attention needs to be focused on evaluating the current wave of assertive community treatment and intensive case management dissemination in rural areas.

Case Management↗

Factors associated with specific language impairment and later language development during early life: a literature review.

It has been reported that 50% of children with specific language impairment (SLI) have persistent SLI, which has been associated with various risk factors. To date, however, there has not been a comprehensive review of studies into different risk factors that could be used by clinicians to facilitate parental counseling and individual case-management. Several studies about the factors associated with SLI were reviewed based on study design. This article presents a review of factors associated with later language development and SLI, and reviews the risk for children who have SLI during early life. The summary provides data including specific biologic and environmental factors that are significantly associated with SLI, to ensure early intervention for children with SLI in the presence of identified risk factors.

Case Management↗