PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9737878

1H nuclear magnetic resonance study on equilibrium between two four-stranded solution conformations of short d(CnT).

Abstract

NMR analysis of d(C4T) showed the slow exchange between two distinct tetramers (each fully symmetric) in solution. For one tetramer, NOE cross-peak patterns characteristic of an i-motif structure (H1'-H1' and H6-H1'/H1'-H6) were observed between C1 and T5, indicating that this tetramer takes a completely intercalated conformation where the T5 residue is stacked on the C1.C1(+) pair of the other duplex (S-form). The other was found to be a tetramer in which one of the duplexes is shifted by one nucleotide unit (R-form), resulting in nonstacking 3' end thymidine residues and an equal number of stacked C.C+ pairs to that of the S-form. The same spectral features were observed for d(C3T) but neither for d(TC3) nor d(TC4), indicative of the critical role of the position of the thymidine residue in the tetrad isomerization. From NMR denaturation profiles, the S-forms were found to be more stable than the R-forms, and the linear relationship between the logarithm of the equilibrium constant (K = [tetramer]/[single]4) and the inverse of temperature (1/T) was confirmed for both forms, indicating conformity to the two-state transition model. Both enthalpy and entropy values of the formation of the S-form from four single strands were more negative than those of the R-form. The enthalpy term should contribute to the stabilization of the S-forms at low temperatures. The difference of the free energy values [DeltaG degrees(S-form) - DeltaG degrees(R-form)] was found to be -2.1 and -2.7 kJ.mol-1 at 20 degreesC for d(C4T) and d(C3T), respectively, explaining the higher stability of the S-forms. With increasing temperature, these two topologies were found to comparably exist at equilibrium in solution with slow exchange via dissociation to the single strands. A biological role of this topological isomerization is also suggested.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

K Kanaori, A Maeda, H Kanehara, K Tajima, K Makino. 1998-09-15. 1H nuclear magnetic resonance study on equilibrium between two four-stranded solution conformations of short d(CnT).. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi980492g

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Sp1 is essential for p16 expression in human diploid fibroblasts during senescence.

BACKGROUND: p16(INK4a) tumor suppressor protein has been widely proposed to mediate entrance of the cells into the senescent stage. Promoter of p16(INK4a) gene contains at least five putative GC boxes, named GC-I to V, respectively. Our previous data showed that a potential Sp1 binding site, within the promoter region from -466 to -451, acts as a positive transcription regulatory element. These results led us to examine how Sp1 and/or Sp3 act on these GC boxes during aging in cultured human diploid fibroblasts. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Mutagenesis studies revealed that GC-I, II and IV, especially GC-II, are essential for p16(INK4a) gene expression in senescent cells. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) and ChIP assays demonstrated that both Sp1 and Sp3 bind to these elements and the binding activity is enhanced in senescent cells. Ectopic overexpression of Sp1, but not Sp3, induced the transcription of p16(INK4a). Both Sp1 RNAi and Mithramycin, a DNA intercalating agent that interferes with Sp1 and Sp3 binding activities, reduced p16(INK4a) gene expression. In addition, the enhanced binding of Sp1 to p16(INK4a) promoter during cellular senescence appeared to be the result of increased Sp1 binding affinity, not an alteration in Sp1 protein level. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: All these results suggest that GC- II is the key site for Sp1 binding and increase of Sp1 binding activity rather than protein levels contributes to the induction of p16(INK4a) expression during cell aging.

Base Composition↗

Application of CE for determination of DNA base composition.

DNA base composition expressed as mol% of guanine plus cytosine (% GC) or GC content is a key parameter of bacterial taxonomy and genomic analyses. Direct chemical determination methods such as HPLC as well as indirect methods based on physical properties of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), melting point (T(m)), and buoyant density (B(d)) have been conventionally applied to determine the GC content. However, these methods require relatively large amounts of sample DNA, time, and labor. We have developed a protocol to determine the GC content by fine separation of nucleosides with CZE. Genomic DNAs with known GC content from 23 bacterial strains were determined by CE at the optimized conditions of 27 degrees C, 20 kV in 50 mM of NaHCO(3) (pH 9.0) and 70 mM SDS added. Nucleosides from <1 microg of DNA hydrolyzed with nuclease-P1 and bacterial alkaline phosphatase were separated in a 75 microm wide and 80 cm long silica capillary. The nucleoside peak areas were determined at 254 nm in less than 12 min. The CE-based determination of GC content requires only small amounts of DNA, and thus should be applicable to environmental genomics (metagenomics), as >90% of environmental micro-organisms are nonculturable and produce only small amounts of genomic DNA.

Base Composition↗