PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9741254

[Does a computerized price comparison module reduce prescribing costs in general practice?].

Abstract

The aim was to assess the trends in prescribed defined daily doses (DDD) and drug expenses before and after the introduction of a computerized cost containment module. On January 1993 the module was introduced in 20 practices in Aarhus County that used the computer record system APEX. Two control groups were made. From the Public Health Insurance in Aarhus County (600,000 inhabitants) data were collected during 1992 and 1993. Compared with te controls there were no changes in prescribed DDD, reimbursement for prescribed drugs, and reimbursement per prescribed DDD in the intervention group after the introduction of the module. Cost containment procedures should be more intensive than just giving the doctors a computer-assisted decision aid.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P Vedsted, J N Nielsen, F Olesen. 1998-08-17. [Does a computerized price comparison module reduce prescribing costs in general practice?].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9741254/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A roadmap for national action on clinical decision support.

This document comprises an AMIA Board of Directors approved White Paper that presents a roadmap for national action on clinical decision support. It is published in JAMIA for archival and dissemination purposes. The full text of this material has been previously published on the AMIA Web site (www.amia.org/inside/initiatives/cds). AMIA is the copyright holder.

Decision Making, Computer-Assisted↗

Viewpoint: controversies surrounding use of order sets for clinical decision support in computerized provider order entry.

Order sets provide straightforward clinical decision support within computerized provider order entry systems. They make "the right thing" easier to do because they are much faster than writing single orders; they deliver real-time, evidence-based prompts; they are easy to update; and they support coverage of multiple patient problems through linkages among order sets. This viewpoint paper discusses controversies surrounding use of order sets--advantages and pitfalls, decision-making criteria, and organizational considerations, including suggestions for vendors. Order sets have the potential to improve clinician efficiency, provide real-time guidance, facilitate compliance with Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services performance measure sets, and encourage overall acceptance of computerized provider order entry, but may not do so unless these controversies are addressed.

Decision Making, Computer-Assisted↗

VisualDx: decision-support software for the diagnosis and management of dermatologic disorders.

The VisualDx system (http://www.logicalimages.com/prodVDx.htm) is a JAVA-based decision-support program developed by Logical Images to be used in clinical care to develop differential diagnoses based upon morphologic finding- and patient finding-driven searching. It consists of several modules, many of which are very relevant to infectious diseases specialists, such as Fever & Rash; International Travel; Drug Eruptions; Smallpox Vaccination; Terrorism Recognition; Immunocompromised, HIV or AIDS; Female Genital Rashes & Growths; and Male Genital Rashes & Growths. Unlike books and atlases indexed by disease, with VisualDx, clinicians can enter patient descriptors and lesion morphologies, resulting in rapid assistance with differential diagnosis. VisualDx also increases clinician awareness of, knowledge about, and skills in the recognition of chemical warfare, bioterrorism, and radiation injuries.

Decision Making, Computer-Assisted↗