PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 9749897

Combining laboratory data sets from multiple institutions using the logical observation identifier names and codes (LOINC).

D M Baorto·J J Cimino·C A Parvin·M G Kahn
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A standard set of names and codes for laboratory test results is critical for any endeavor requiring automated data pooling, including multi-institutional research and cross-facility patient care. This need has led to the development of the logical observation identifier names and codes (LOINC) database and its test-naming convention. This study is an expansion of a pilot study using LOINC to exchange laboratory data between Columbia University Medical Center in New York and Barnes Hospital at Washington University in St. Louis, where we described complexities and ambiguities that arose in the LOINC coding process (D.M. Baorto, J.J. Cimino, C.A. Parvin, M.G. Kahn, Proc. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 1997). For the present study, we required the same two medical centers to again extract raw laboratory data from their local information system for a defined patient population, translate tests into LOINC and provide aggregate data which could then be used to compare laboratory utilization. Here we examine a larger number of tests from each site which have been recoded using an updated version of the LOINC database. We conclude that the coding of local tests into LOINC can often be complex, especially the 'Kind of Property' field and apparently trivial differences in choices made by individual institutions can result in nonmatches in electronically pooled data. In the present study, 75% of failures to match the same tests between different institutions using LOINC codes were due to differences in local coding choices. LOINC has the potential to eliminate the need for detailed human inspection during the pooling of laboratory data from diverse sites and perhaps even a built-in capability to adjust matching stringency by selecting subsets of LOINC fields required to match. However, a quality standard coding procedure is required and examples highlighted in this paper may require special attention while mapping to LOINC.

Explore related subjects

Clinical Laboratory TechniquesDatabases, FactualDecision Making, Computer-AssistedElectronic Data ProcessingHumansInterinstitutional RelationsSoftwareTerminology as TopicJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D M Baorto, J J Cimino, C A Parvin, M G Kahn. 1998. Combining laboratory data sets from multiple institutions using the logical observation identifier names and codes (LOINC).. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1386-5056(98)00089-6

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2001

Pharmacogenomics: implications for laboratory medicine.

Pharmacogenomics deals with the interactions of individual genetic constitution with drug therapy. It has potentially far reaching consequences for drug development and future treatment strategies, but also for clinical in vitro diagnostics. With increasing knowledge about interactions between genes and drug treatment, there will be an equally increasing demand for rapid and reliable diagnostic tests prior to the institution of therapy. In fact, it is very likely that pharmacogenetic tests will make up a significant proportion of total molecular biology testing in the coming years. Therefore, this review focuses on the implications of pharmacogenomics on the clinical laboratory.

Clinical Laboratory Techniques↗
PubMed2001

Private practitioners and their role in the resurgence of malaria in Mumbai (Bombay) and Navi Mumbai (New Bombay), India: serving the affected or aiding an epidemic?

The increased emphasis on privatization of the health care sector in many developing countries by international financial institutions and national governments expects an expanding role for private health care practitioners in the management of major communicable diseases such as tuberculosis, malaria, acute respiratory infections (ARIs) and sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). Largely unexamined in the Indian context, however, is the socio-cultural context, the micro-level political environment in which private practitioners carry out their activities, and the quality of care they provide to their patients. Examining these aspects is significant given the impressive growth of the country's private health sector during the past decade. This paper reports the results of an ethnographic study carried out in Mumbai (Bombay) and Nav Mumbai (New Bombay), India on private general practitioners (GPs) and their role in the management of malaria at a time when these two neighboring cities were in the midst of the worst malaria epidemic in over 60 years. Described are the characteristics of a sample of 48 private practitioners from the two cities, and their clinics. This is followed by a discussion of the data gathered through untructured interviews with practitioners and patients, and complemented by observational data on doctor-patient encounters gathered at 16 clinics over a 9-month period. The findings of the study suggest that many practitioners in Mumbai and Navi Mumbai were poorly qualified and did not play a supportive role in the two cities' public health departments to bring the epidemic under control. The majority of the practitioners adopted diagnostic and treatment practices that were not consistent with the guidelines laid down by WHO and India's National Malaria Eradication Programme. Very few practitioners, especially those practicing in low-income areas, relied on a peripheral blood-smear test to make a diagnosis. Practitioners whose clientele was mostly the poor commonly resorted to giving one-day treatment to febrile patients that included injectable antimalarials and broad spectrum antibiotics. Such practitioners justified their mode of diagnosis and treatment by asserting that they were only responding to the demands placed on them by their patients who could not afford a blood-smear test or a full prescription. The paper argues that practitioners who acquiesced to patient demands were at once exacerbating the health problems of their patients and jeopardizing the prospects for the epidemic to be brought under control. Driven primarily by the need to retain the patronage of patients and maintain one's popularity in a highly competitive health arena, many providers practiced medicine that was unethical and dangerous. The paper concludes by discussing the ramifications of this study for malaria control in Mumbai and Navi Mumbai, and highlights a few salient health policy issues concerning the growth of the private health sector in India and its regulation.

Clinical Laboratory Techniques↗