PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9754367

[Frozen section examination in thyroid pathology. Technique and effective indications].

Abstract

Frozen section examination for intraoperative diagnosis is often difficult in thyroid pathology. Fine-needle aspiration is widely used in the patients selection for surgery. Such a selection is accompanied by an increase in difficult frozen section cases, whose diagnosis is often differed to permanent sections. Thus, frozen section sensitivity is relatively low. In the era of cost containment, an increasing number of authors suggest that frozen section examination is unnecessary, and that surgical planning could rely on preoperative cytology only. Others consider fine-needle aspiration cytological evaluation and frozen section examination as complementary tools and recommend their association. The authors describe the technical aspects and difficulties of frozen section examination in thyroid pathology, and discuss its interest in surgical planning, in the light of preoperative cytology. Each team has to estimate local thyroid cytology development and accuracy, to define new indications for frozen section examination in thyroid pathology, according to local therapeutic choices. Such an approach could consistently reduce the number of intraoperative consultation for thyroid pathology, without prejudice for the patients.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S Guyétant, J P Saint-André. 1998. [Frozen section examination in thyroid pathology. Technique and effective indications].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9754367/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Targeting difficult accessible breast lesions: MRI-guided needle localization using a freehand technique in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet.

PURPOSE: To report the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided needle localization for diagnosis of MRI detected suspicious breast lesions located in difficult accessible regions of the breast, using the freehand method in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In five patients with five MRI-only breast lesions underwent MRI-guided needle localization for histopathologic evaluation of the lesions. All interventional procedures were performed in a 3.0 T MRI system with the patient in prone position and by using a dedicated phased array breast coil. MRI-guided needle localizations were performed by using a freehand technique. In our study, the high-resolution scan allowed preprocedural localization of all lesions without use of contrast enhancement. In all cases contrast-enhanced MRI was performed after insertion of the wire to confirm the tip of the wire in direct contact with the enhancing lesion. RESULTS: Needle localizations were performed in five patients. Histopathologic evaluation of tissue after surgery excision biopsy revealed one lymph node, three invasive ductal carcinoma and one ductal carcinoma in situ. Lesion size varied from 6 to 30 mm. Mean duration time was 25 min. No complications occurred during the intervention method. In the patient with the benign lesion control MRI of the breast after 6 months confirmed lesion removal. CONCLUSIONS: MRI-guided needle localization by using a freehand technique in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet is a safe and accurate method for diagnosis of difficult accessible breast lesions only visible on MRI.

Biopsy, Needle↗