PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9755913

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy facilitated by hydrodissection.

Abstract

Hydrodissection has been used in the past in open cholecystectomy to facilitate dissection in difficult cases. Injection of 50 mL of saline, with a laparoscopic cyst aspiration needle during laparoscopic cholecystectomy between the gallbladder and the liver, causes an edematous area 1-1.5 cm thick between the gallbladder and the liver. This allows dissection to be carried out prograde and retrograde with less bleeding and a much smaller chance of gallbladder perforation and the escape of stones. One hundred and thirty-three laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LC) utilizing hydrodissection were compared to 48 historical controls (HC), comparing blood loss, stone spillage, and dissection time. Blood loss was on average less than 5 mL in the LC group and 56 mL in the HC. One case of minor biliary spillage occurred in the LC group and 11 gallbladder perforations in the HC group. Time taken for the dissection was 6.4 minutes for LC and 16 minutes for HC. Laparoscopic hydrodissection was accompanied by less bleeding, fewer incidents of gallbladder damage and stone spilling, and a much faster dissection time. It can also be performed prograde, which is helpful in liver cirrhosis.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G P Naude, E Morris, F S Bongard. 1998. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy facilitated by hydrodissection.. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.1998.8.215

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Retropubic versus perineal radical prostatectomy in early prostate cancer: eight-year experience.

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy in men and the second leading cause of cancer death. A randomized study was performed on patients with localized prostate cancer and treated with radical prostatectomy using the perineal or the retropubic approach comparing oncological outcomes, cancer control, and functional results. STUDY DESIGN: Between 1997 and 2004, in a randomized study 200 patients underwent a radical prostatectomy performed by retropubic (100 patients) or perineal (100 patients) approach. RESULTS: Differences between hospital stay, duration of catheter drainage, intraoperative blood loss, and transfusion requirements were statistically significant in favor of perineal prostatectomy. Differences between positive surgical margins and urinary continence in the two groups were not statistically significant at 6 and 24 months. Differences between erectile function at 24 months were statistically significant in favor of retropubic prostatectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Radical perineal prostatectomy is an excellent alternative approach for radical surgery in the treatment of early prostate cancer.

Blood Loss, Surgical↗

Bipolar pulse coagulation for resection of the cirrhotic liver.

BACKGROUND: The major technical challenge of liver surgery is controlling bleeding during transection of the parenchyma. The Gyrus hand piece (GHP) is a bipolar diathermy pulsation instrument that is similar in design to a large hemostat (Péan) clamp that divides tissue while the clamp remains closed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the peri-operative data from 10 patients with early cirrhosis (stage 1-4) who underwent liver resection for hepatocellular cancer between February 2004 and July 2005. Five consecutive patients who underwent resection using the GHP were compared to five other patients who underwent resection using the traditional "crush clamp technique" (CCT). Six patients underwent minor hepatectomy (<3 segments) and four underwent major hepatectomy (>3 segments). RESULTS: When the GHP was used, the mean Pringle time was 13 +/- 5 min, mean blood loss was 520 mL +/- 118, and mean operative time was 252 +/- 15 min. When the CCT was used, the average Pringle time was 13 +/- 3 min, mean blood loss was 630 +/- 67 mL, and mean operative time was 312 +/- 29 min. There were 2 major complications in the GHP group and 3 in the CCT group. Major complications included transient hepatic failure (i.e., ascites/encephalopathy) and biloma formation. CONCLUSIONS: One patient from each group suffered a minor wound complication. The average hospital stay was 8 days (range, 6-9) for the GHP group, and 8 days (range, 7-10) for CCT group. The operative mortality rate was 0%. Our preliminary results demonstrate that GHP provides an excellent and safe alternative to CCT for dividing the liver parenchyma in cirrhotic patients.

Blood Loss, Surgical↗