PubMed · 9758105
Induction versus Popper: substance versus semantics.
Abstract
This article reviews concepts of classical logic and induction, with special attention to the controversies surrounding Popperian claims that induction is impossible and does not exist. I argue that some of the controversy is semantic, and hence Popperian criticisms of induction must be translated carefully into ordinary language to be appreciated by inductively oriented epidemiologists. With this translation, the substance of the debate is not whether induction is possible (it is) or exists (it does), but whether and how we should employ probabilistic reasoning about hypotheses in epidemiological inference.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
S Greenland. 1998. Induction versus Popper: substance versus semantics.. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije%2F27.4.543
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.