PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9758421

Risk revisited.

Abstract

As our knowledge of dental caries and periodontal diseases has increased, our perspective has changed from viewing these diseases as ubiquitous to one which sees a variety of risk profiles in a population. Now, from a perspective of assigning risk, caries and periodontitis can be thought to be more like some of our common medical conditions, i.e., certain people or subgroups of the population are at higher risk than others and that prevention and intervention involve a combination of personal behaviors and professional practices. Research into risk assessment, however, is often hampered by confusing and ambiguous use of terminology. This commentary proposes some specific definitions for terms used in risk assessment in dentistry. These terms include risk factor, risk indicator, demographic risk factor, risk predictor (risk marker), prognostic factor, risk model, and prediction model.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J D Beck. 1998. Risk revisited.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1998.tb01954.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The causal relationship between multiple cardiovascular diseases and glioblastoma: A Mendelian randomization study.

Observational studies suggest an association between glioblastoma (GBM) and cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), but a causal relationship remains unestablished. This study aimed to investigate the causal link between multiple CVDs and GBM risk. The inverse variance weighted method indicated that all 18 CVDs had significant causal associations with GBM (P&#x2005;<&#x2005;.05). Genetically predicted CVDs were uniformly associated with a lower risk of GBM (odds ratio&#x2005;<&#x2005;1), identifying them as potential protective factors. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the absence of significant heterogeneity or horizontal pleiotropy, and the MR-Steiger test validated the correct causal direction. This Mendelian randomization (MR) study provides evidence that a range of CVDs are causally associated with a decreased risk of developing GBM. These findings suggest shared biological pathways and offer new insights for understanding GBM etiology. We conducted a 2-sample MR analysis using publicly available genome-wide association study data. GBM was the outcome, and 18 cardiovascular-related traits (including coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, and venous thromboembolism) were exposures. Instrumental variables were single-nucleotide polymorphisms significantly associated with exposures (P&#x2005;<&#x2005;5&#x2005;&#xd7;&#x2005;10-8). The primary analysis used the inverse variance weighted method, supplemented with MR-Egger, weighted median, and weighted mode methods. Sensitivity analyses, including Cochran Q test, MR-Egger intercept test, leave-one-out analysis, and MR-Steiger directionality test, were performed to ensure robustness.

Causality↗