PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9769621

Sublingual morphine: efficacy reviewed.

Abstract

Current guidelines on the treatment of moderate to severe cancer pain recommend the use of scheduled doses of opioids for persistent pain combined with "as needed" doses of similar agents for breakthrough pain. Oral drugs given on an "as needed" basis can be problematic for patients with difficulty in swallowing or for those who suffer from nausea and vomiting. Further, breakthrough pain can become excruciating in a relatively short time, a drawback for analgesics that require gastrointestinal (GI) absorption before pain relief can begin. Hence, there is considerable interest in the development of novel drug administration routes to provide rapid relief of breakthrough pain, particularly through a route that bypasses the GI system. Sublingually administered morphine has sometimes been used in the treatment of breakthrough pain because some believe it provides effective analgesia via an appropriate alternate route. Available pharmacological data, however, do not consistently support the rapid absorption of morphine through the sublingual mucosa, and clinical data concerning the efficacy of sublingual morphine for the treatment of cancer pain are limited, not well-controlled, and inconclusive. While there seems to be a need for provision of rapid, effective analgesia to cancer patients by an alternative route, sublingual morphine may not satisfy this requirement. Newer formulations of analgesics should be tested in the treatment of breakthrough pain due to cancer.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P H Coluzzi. 1998. Sublingual morphine: efficacy reviewed.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0885-3924(98)00046-3

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of sublingual nitroglycerin test and low-dose isoproterenol test in patients with unexplained syncope.

Despite the widespread use of head-up tilt testing as a means for diagnosing vasovagal syncope, standardization of test methodology remains a controversial issue. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic value of head-up tilt testing potentiated with sublingual nitroglycerin with that of head-up tilt testing potentiated with low-dose isoproterenol. For this purpose, 71 patients with unexplained syncope (mean age 43 years) and 30 asymptomatic controls were studied. All underwent the sublingual nitroglycerin and low-dose isoproterenol tests on separate days in a randomized fashion. The protocol of the 2 tests was similar and consisted of 2 phases. Initially, subjects were tilted at 60 degrees for 20 minutes without medication; then, if syncope did not occur, patients and controls received sublingual nitroglycerin (300 microg) or low-dose intravenous isoproterenol (mean infusion rate 1.3 +/- 0.5 microg/min) and continued to be tilted at 60 degrees for a further 20 minutes. During the sublingual nitroglycerin test, a positive response (syncope associated with sudden hypotension and bradycardia) occurred in 35 patients (49%), a negative response in 36 (51%), and drug intolerance in none (0%). During the low-dose isoproterenol test, these percentages were 41%, 59%, and 6%, respectively. A concordant response was observed in 53 cases (75%). Among controls, 3 subjects (10%) had a positive response to the sublingual nitroglycerin test and 4 (13%) to the low-dose isoproterenol test. It is concluded that sublingual nitroglycerin and low-dose isoproterenol are equivalent tests for evaluating patients with unexplained syncope. The sublingual nitroglycerin test, however, is simpler, better tolerated, and safer than the low-dose isoproterenol test and, thus, more suitable for routine clinical use.

Administration, Sublingual↗

Methodology of head-up tilt testing potentiated with sublingual nitroglycerin in unexplained syncope.

Shortened head-up tilt testing (HUT) potentiated with sublingual nitroglycerin (60 degrees passive standing for 20 minutes followed, if negative, by 400 microg of sublingual nitroglycerin spray with the test continuing for another 20 minutes) differs from conventional nitroglycerin HUT for a shorter drug-free phase (20 vs 45 minutes). To compare the positivity rate of the 2 protocols, both tests were performed in a randomized sequence in 10 patients with unexplained syncope (study 1), and another 42 patients were randomly assigned either to conventional or to shortened nitroglycerin HUT (study 2). To evaluate the reproducibility of the shortened nitroglycerin HUT, another 38 patients with unexplained syncope underwent 2 consecutive tests within a 7+/-8 day interval (study 3). Finally, to evaluate the specificity of the test, 47 control subjects underwent shortened nitroglycerin HUT (study 4). Seven positive responses were observed during shortened nitroglycerin HUT, and there were 8 positive responses during conventional nitroglycerin HUT (p = NS) in the study 1 group. Fifteen positive (71%) responses, 5 negative responses, and 1 exaggerated response were observed during shortened nitroglycerin HUT; 16 positive (76%, p = NS vs. shortened nitroglycerin HUT), 3 negative, and 2 exaggerated responses were observed during conventional nitroglycerin HUT in the study 2 group. During the first test, 21 patients (55%) had a positive, 15 patients had a negative, and 2 patients had an exaggerated response in study group 3. During the second test, 15 positive (39%), 19 negative, and 4 exaggerated responses were observed. Thus, the reproducibility was 67% for a positive and 94% for a negative test. In control subjects, 2 positive (4%) responses, 38 negative, and 7 exaggerated responses were observed with a specificity of 96% in study group 4. In patients with unexplained syncope, shortened nitroglycerin HUT allowed a positivity rate similar to that of the conventional test. Moreover, the shortened test provided a high specificity and adequate reproducibility for both the positive and the negative responses.

Administration, Sublingual↗