PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 9776523

Spatial disparity affects visual-auditory interactions in human sensorimotor processing.

Abstract

Information from the auditory and visual systems converges in the nervous system with physiological and behavioral consequences. Most of our knowledge about the rules governing such convergence has been obtained in experiments where the strength or the timing of the individual auditory and visual stimuli has been varied. Relatively little attention has been paid to the spatial relationship between different modalities of stimuli in multisensory experiments. We studied saccadic reaction times of human subjects to bimodal auditory and visual stimulus presentations under two conditions: first, with the targets spatially coincident and, second, with various degrees of spatial separation or disparity. In the first experiment, we found that the saccadic reaction times were consistently shorter than would be predicted by independent processing of information about the visual and auditory targets. These results suggest convergence of multimodal information at one or more loci within the nervous system. In the second experiment, we found that saccadic latency gradually increased as spatial distance between the auditory and visual targets increased. Evidence for neural summation was found over a wide range of spatial disparities. These results suggest that multisensory information can be integrated and have significant influences on behavior over a surprisingly large range of spatial disparity.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L K Harrington, C K Peck. 1998. Spatial disparity affects visual-auditory interactions in human sensorimotor processing.. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002210050512

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Acquired nystagmus.

Traditionally, acquired forms of nystagmus have been classified in descriptive terms based on their clinical features and recorded waveforms. In the past 20 years, the mechanisms of several major forms of nystagmus have been elucidated; animal and mathematical models for these ocular oscillations have been developed. These advances, which owe much to modern anatomical, physiological, and pharmacological techniques, have enhanced the diagnostic value of nystagmus and provide the basis for developing rational therapy.

Eye Movements

Don't look! Don't touch! Inhibitory control of eye and hand movements.

Inhibitory control of eye and hand movements was compared in the stop-signal task. Subjects moved their eyes to the right or left or pressed keys on the right or left in response to visual stimuli. The stimuli were either central (angle brackets pointing left or right) or peripheral (plus signs turning into Xs left or right of fixation), and the task was either pro (respond on the same side as the stimulus) or anti (respond on the opposite side). Occasionally, a stop signal was presented, which instructed subjects to inhibit their responses to the go stimulus. Stop-signal reaction times (SSRTs) were faster overall for eye movements than for hand movements, and they were affected differently by stimulus conditions (central vs. peripheral) and task (pro vs. anti), suggesting that the eyes and hands are inhibited by different processes operating under similar principles (i.e., a race between stop and go processes).

Eye Movements