PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 9790365

Can we decrease postdatism in women with an unfavorable cervix and a negative fetal fibronectin test result at term by serial membrane sweeping?

E F Magann·M F McNamara·N S Whitworth·S P Chauhan·R A Thorpe·J C Morrison
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine whether the risk for postdatism can be reduced by serial membrane sweeping in women with an unfavorable cervix at 39 weeks' gestation and a negative fetal fibronectin test result. STUDY DESIGN: Women with uncomplicated pregnancies, who were candidates for a vaginal delivery with an unfavorable cervix at 39 weeks' gestation and a negative fetal fibronectin test result were asked to participate in this investigation. Patients were chosen at random and assigned to a group for membrane sweeping every 3 days or to a control group who received gentle examinations every 3 days. RESULTS: Sixty-five women were selected at random for serial membrane sweeping (n = 33) or for the control group (n = 32). Although gestational age and Bishop score at study entry were similar, the gestational age on admission for delivery was earlier in the membrane sweeping group (39.9 +/- 0.3) versus the control group (41.5 +/- 0.6, P < .0001). The Bishop score on admission to labor and delivery was greater (8.8 +/- 2.1) in the membrane sweeping group than in the control group (6.2 +/- 2.7, P < .0001). The number of women admitted for labor inductions at 42 weeks' gestation was 18 of 32 (56%) in the control group versus none (0 of 24) in the membrane-sweeping group (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Women with an unfavorable cervix at 39 weeks' gestation and a negative fetal fibronectin test result are at risk for not being delivered by 41 completed weeks and thus may require postdates induction or antenatal testing. Serial membrane sweeping significantly reduces the risk of postdatism and induction of labor.

Explore related subjects

Cervical RipeningCervix UteriCosts and Cost AnalysisExtraembryonic MembranesFemaleFetusFibronectinsGestational AgeHumansLabor, InducedPalpationPregnancyPregnancy, ProlongedClinical TrialJournal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

E F Magann, M F McNamara, N S Whitworth, S P Chauhan, R A Thorpe, J C Morrison. 1998. Can we decrease postdatism in women with an unfavorable cervix and a negative fetal fibronectin test result at term by serial membrane sweeping?. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70184-x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2003

Methods for cervical ripening and induction of labor.

Induction of labor is common in obstetric practice. According to the most current studies, the rate varies from 9.5 to 33.7 percent of all pregnancies annually. In the absence of a ripe or favorable cervix, a successful vaginal birth is less likely. Therefore, cervical ripening or preparedness for induction should be assessed before a regimen is selected. Assessment is accomplished by calculating a Bishop score. When the Bishop score is less than 6, it is recommended that a cervical ripening agent be used before labor induction. Nonpharmacologic approaches to cervical ripening and labor induction have included herbal compounds, castor oil, hot baths, enemas, sexual intercourse, breast stimulation, acupuncture, acupressure, transcutaneous nerve stimulation, and mechanical and surgical modalities. Of these nonpharmacologic methods, only the mechanical and surgical methods have proven efficacy for cervical ripening or induction of labor. Pharmacologic agents available for cervical ripening and labor induction include prostaglandins, misoprostol, mifepristone, and relaxin. When the Bishop score is favorable, the preferred pharmacologic agent is oxytocin.

Cervical Ripening↗
PubMed2003

Comparative efficacy and cost of the prostaglandin analogs dinoprostone and misoprostol as labor preinduction agents.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the relative efficacy and cost of three commercially available prostaglandin analogs, misoprostol (Cytotec), dinoprostone gel (Prepidil), and dinoprostone insert (Cervidil), as labor preinduction agents. STUDY DESIGN: One-hundred eleven women with an unfavorable cervix who underwent labor induction were assigned randomly to receive either misoprostol 50 microg every 6 hours for two doses, dinoprostone gel 0.5 mg every 6 hours for two doses, or dinoprostone insert 10 mg for one dose intravaginally. Twelve hours later, oxytocin induction was initiated per standardized protocol. Efficacy and cost of the labor preinduction/induction with the study treatments were compared. RESULTS: Mean Bishop score change (+/-SD) over the initial 12-hour interval was significantly greater in the misoprostol group (5.2 +/- 3.1) compared with the dinoprostone insert (3.2 +/- 2.3) or the dinoprostone gel groups (2.2 +/- 1.3, P <.0001). The proportion of women who reached complete dilation (68.4%, 50.0%, 51.4%, respectively; P =.14) and who were delivered (60.5%, 47.4%, 40.0%, respectively; P =.10) within 24 hours of the initiation of induction were not significantly different between the misoprostol, dinoprostone insert, and dinoprostone gel groups. Induction-to-delivery intervals, however, were significantly shorter among women who treated with misoprostol (24.0 +/- 10.8 hours) compared with either the dinoprostone gel (31.6 +/- 13.4 hours) or the dinoprostone insert (32.2 +/- 14.7 hours, P <.05). Overall mean cost per patient that was incurred by labor induction was significantly less for the misoprostol group ($1036.13) compared with the dinoprostone insert group ($1565.72) or the dinoprostone gel group ($1572.92, P <.0001). No significant differences were noted with respect to the mode of delivery or to the adverse maternal/neonatal outcome. CONCLUSION: Misoprostol is more cost-effective than the comparable commercial dinoprostone prostaglandin preparations as an adjuvant to labor induction in women with an unfavorable cervix.

Cervical Ripening↗