PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 9793885

Establishing a collaborative psychopharmacology practice: practical considerations.

D Grimaldi·A Cousins
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Prescriptive authority for the advanced practice psychiatric nurse (APPN) is accompanied by the following advantages: expanded treatment repertoire, increased marketability due to the practicality of having one provider for psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy, and increased collaboration with colleagues. The disadvantages associated with prescriptive authority include: increased professional responsibility and associated liability, labor intensity due to continuing educational demands, medical record documentation, and time-consuming dialogues with referring clinicians. A preexisting relationship between the APPN and the psychiatrist that is based on mutual respect and similarities in treatment philosophies and ethical issues positively influence outcomes.

Explore related subjects

Drug PrescriptionsGroup PracticeHumansLiability, LegalMarketing of Health ServicesNurse CliniciansProfessional AutonomyPsychiatric NursingPsychiatryPsychopharmacologyUnited StatesJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D Grimaldi, A Cousins. 1998. Establishing a collaborative psychopharmacology practice: practical considerations.. https://doi.org/10.3928/0279-3695-19981001-15

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Clicking for pills.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Drug Prescriptions↗
PubMed2007

Safe prescribing.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Drug Prescriptions↗
PubMed2007

Provision of pain management by a pharmacist with prescribing authority.

PURPOSE: The clinical and financial outcomes of a pain clinic managed by a pharmacist with prescribing authority are described. SUMMARY: Pharmacist clinicians in a for-profit, integrated health system recently received permission to bill for their services in certain ambulatory clinics. A pharmacist clinician, who had an individual Drug Enforcement Administration number and whose services are billable under New Mexico law, was chosen to assume the medication management responsibilities in a clinic where 90% of the patient population is treated for chronic non-cancer-related pain. No additional personnel were needed, and no additional space was required, eliminating overhead for the space and utilities needed for operating a new clinic. With the ability to bill for the pharmacist clinician's services, a new model for justification of clinical pharmacy services was developed for the ambulatory care clinics. The revenue generated was tracked by a medical billing system, and clinical outcomes were tracked using the clinic's database for patients' individual visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores. Between June 2004 and June 2005, an average of 18 patients were seen by the pharmacist clinician each day. The clinic generated 107,550 dollars of actual revenue and saved the health plan over 450,000 dollars. There was a consistent decrease in mean VAS pain scores with continued visits. CONCLUSION: Patients with chronic non-cancer-related pain were managed effectively by a pharmacist with prescribing authority and refill authorization in a pain management clinic. The favorable clinical outcomes, revenue generated, and cost savings achieved justified the pharmacist clinician's services in this health system.

Drug Prescriptions↗