PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 9797580

Competencies of basic surgical trainees.

Abstract

The primary objective of the Hospital Recognition Committee is to ensure that the so-called lost tribe of SHOs in surgery obtain a properly structured training during each six-month post (1). Systematic, supervised training for Senior House Officers (SHOs) is a vital prelude to optimum Higher Specialist Training (2). The identification of the components of competence would be a good starting point for training, appraisal and ultimately assessment. Competence is more than performance based on knowledge (3), skills (4) and professional attitudes (5). It is the way in which these elements are combined and applied in the clinical arena that makes the concept of competence crucial to good practice (6). This integrated approach to competence was the reason that a piece of research--jointly funded by the National Health Service Executive and the Department for Education and Employment--was undertaken. It was conducted within the Yorkshire and Northern Region. Its object was to identify the competencies--both core and specialty specific--of SHOs, in a variety of specialties. This paper presents our findings in relation to Basic Surgical Training. Clearly there is a continuum which starts on the first day in the grade and ends after two years, or when they have developed the appropriate skills. During this period the SHO should gradually increase his competence so that at the end he is able to accept the responsibilities of a specialist registrar. Our continuum defines initial and target competency standards which can be used as the basis of SHO appraisals and possibly inspection visits. Our attention has focused upon SHOs rather than those elements of training that are provided by the post, eg, rotas, time-tables, and teaching sessions(7).

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

I Ilott, G Bunch. 1998. Competencies of basic surgical trainees.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9797580/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

General practitioners' experiences of patients' complaints: qualitative study.

OBJECTIVE: To examine how general practitioners experience patients' complaints. SETTING: General practices in Lambeth, Southwark, and Lewisham health authority. PARTICIPANTS: Representative sample of 30 general practitioners who had had complaints made against them under either the old or new complaints system. DESIGN: Qualitative study with detailed interviews. RESULTS: Participants described their experiences of patients' complaints in three stages: initial impact, conflict, and resolution. The first stage described being out of control, feelings of shock and panic, and a sense of indignation towards patients generally. The second stage described the many conflicts generated by the complaint: emotional conflicts such as feelings of anger, depression, and even suicide, conflicts around aspects of professional identity including doubts about clinical competence, conflicts with family and colleagues, and conflicts arising from the management of the complaint. The third stage described a sense of resolution. For many this meant practising defensively, for others it meant planning to leave general practice, and for a minority no resolution was achieved. Not all participants, however, reported such a negative experience. Some described how they had become immune to complaints, and a small minority described the complaint as a learning experience. CONCLUSION: The initial impact stage and conflict stage may be necessary aspects of the experience that general practitioners endure when they have a complaint made against them. Support structures should, however, be in place to help general practitioners through these stages.

Attitude of Health Personnel

[Why research?].

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Attitude of Health Personnel